The union uses the scorched earth policy in Georgia to destroy the resources
to destroy resources
<u>Explanation:</u>
Sherman thought that by using a total war strategy would bring the horror of the war to the people, and it helped to end the war.
His force followed a scorched earth policy, for destroying the military target such as industry, infrastructure and civilian property and disturbing the confederacy economy, and transportation economy the policy states that it is aims to destroy the enemy resources and to occupy the areas which is wealthy.
Ito most likely <u>"suffered a change in personality"</u>.
PFC or the prefrontal cortex is the cerebral cortex covering the front side of the frontal lobe. This cerebrum district has been embroiled in arranging complex psychological conduct, personality articulation, basic leadership, and directing social conduct. Harm to this part of the mind as Ito suffered, causes a lessened capability with regards to social feelings yet leaves logical thinking unharmed.
AT our current technology, we can only predict the wheather in about 5 days ahead.
The larger the number of days that we predict, the lower the accuracy of the forecast would be. Even the forecast for one day after current date still has questionable success score (because study shows the accuracy of a one-day wheather forecast is only about 53%)
Answer:
Efficacy versus effectiveness
Explanation:
Efficacy versus effectiveness are both the same term but are different to some extent. Both terms are used to describe and get the result of the research. But we can describe effectiveness and efficacy in the medical condition in a different context. Effectiveness in the medical condition is getting the result in the natural wold environment without any controlled condition. Whereas the efficacy is reverse from effectiveness as the efficacy is the result under the controlled condition. The efficacy described how the medicine is used in controlled or ideal conditions whereas the effectiveness described how the medicine works in an average clinical setting or the natural world environment.
In Simons and Chabris’s (1999) experiment, participants are focused on a challengingperceptual task, counting the white team’s basketball passes while ignoring the black team’s basketball passes. Because of the challenging nature of the task:
A. Inattentional blindness is more likely to occur
B. Attentional capture of irrelevant stimuli is more likely to occur
C. Attention shift capacity is less likely to occur
D. The spotlight model of attention is needed to explain the data
Answer:
A. Inattentional blindness is more likely to occur
Explanation:
Inattentional blindness often referred to as Perceptual blindness is a term in psychology which describes the failure of an individual or observer to notice or perceive a fully visible but unexpected object, due to the attention being given or channeled to another task at that moment.
This is a phenomenon that was first coined by Irvin Rock and Arien Mack, in 1992, both are psychologists.
The most common experiments demonstrating inattentional blindness is the "invisible gorilla test" carried out by Christopher Chabris, Ph.D. and Daniel Simons, Ph.D.
