Answer:
to motivate high performance for uninteresting jobs make performance contingent on extrinsic rewards.
Explanation:
Extrinsic rewards means the motivation i.e. controlled and produced via payment, awards and appreciations. In the case when the job is not interesting so the motivation level should be high in this situation and when the job is interesting the motivation level should not high
So as per the given situation, the above statement should be considered as an answer
First, a consumer will analyze the cost of the products.
Next, the costumer will analyze the benefit that that products could bring for them. Let's say that both products cost $ 50. The costumer may think :
- The concert will give me about 3 hours of happiness
- while the jeans could give me about 3 years and it motivate me to maintain my weight.
After weighing the benefit, the jeans is more favorable to him because it bring more benefit to him than the tickets so he chose to use his money to buy the jeans instead
The percentage increase in the total sales for 2006 is 15% while the increase in sales of the trench coats is 23.3%; therefore the percentage increase in total sales of trench coats is 8.3% faster.
Computation:
1. The total amount of sales for 2006 and 2007:


2. Now, the percentage increase will be determined for the total number of coats and trench coats:
For the total number of coats, the values used will be the total sales of 2006, and total sales of 2007.

For the trench coats the values used will be the sale of trench coats in 2006 and 2007.

3. Now, the net percentage increase in sales due to the trench coats is computed as follows:

Therefore, the correct option is option B. Sales of trench coats increased 8. 3 percentage points faster than total coat sales.
To know more about percentages of increase in sales, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/45525
Answer:
The statement is: True.
Explanation:
A common-cause variation shows changes because of unknown reasons within a series of undifferentiated produced items. The method aims to measure the accuracy of the manufacturing process given expected factors that could bring fluctuations in the output. Common-cause variations can be attributed to natural reasons such as employees' fatigue or distraction.
<span>the result will be an overdraft </span>