Even is he existed, he is dead for centuries.
Explanation:
- The lack of credible material and written sources related to the narratives of Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table might suggest that historical Arthur did not even exist.
- Yet, the prevalence of Arthurian legends in European culture require particular caution from historians who address the issue.
- Depending on what attitude historians have about oral tradition, its significance and role, different, sometimes even completely opposite, answers are formed to the question of whether or not legends are based on truth.
- Some historians still deny the existence of King Arthur today, while others emphasize his enormous role in sixteenth-century British history.
- The truth, as usual, is probably somewhere in between, so today is the most accepted viewpoint that speaks in favor of the existence of Arthur, but only as a warlord or local lord of some of the disparate areas inhabited by the Celtic tribes - the Britons.
Learn more on King Arthur on
brainly.com/question/558817
brainly.com/question/2673644
#learnwithBrainly
I only know two of the answers.
1. Hector
2. Honor
Answer:
This passage shows that Turkey once had a <em>"parliamentary"</em> form of government but now has a <em>"presidential form of governement".</em>
Explanation:
Parliamentary system
- The government derives its authority and legitimacy from parliament and not from the people.
- The legislative body elects the Prime Minister and makes the laws.
- The head of state is normally different from the head of government.
Presidential system
- The people elect the President.
- The President is a representative of the State and Head of Government.
- Legislators may represent a different option than the one represented by the president.
- The president chooses his/her ministers.
"Opposition to evil is as much a duty as is cooperation with good." is Mahatma Gandhi's <span>most consistent statement with political views.</span>
