All categories

2 years ago

Does 2 feet and 1 inch add up too 3 feet

Mathematics

2 answers:

Nostrana [21]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

three feet equals 36 inches so two feet and one inch add up to 25 inches

Makovka662 [10]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

2 feet + 1 foot = 3 feet

1 foot = 12 inches, not 1 inch

If helpful, please give 5 star, thanks, and brainliest!

You might be interested in

If j = k, then j + 9 = k + 9 represents which algebraic property

sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

c) The given expression represents Addition Property of Equality.

Step-by-step explanation:

Here, the given expression is j = k

Now by ADDITION PROPERTY OF EQUALITY:

The property that states that if you add the same number to both sides of an equation, the sides remain equal.

So, if A = B ⇒ A + x = B + x

Now, here given that j = k

If we add the same number 9 on both the sides, the equation remains undisturbed.

⇒ j + 9 = k + 9

Hence, the above expression represents Addition Property of Equality.

8 0

3 years ago

The scientist performs additional analyses and observes that the number of major earthquakes does appear to be decreasing but wo

kifflom [539]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

A regression model was determined in order to predict the number of earthquakes above magnitude 7.0 regarding the year.

^Y= 164.67 - 0.07Xi

Y: earthquake above magnitude 7.0

X: year

The researcher wants to test the claim that the regression is statistically significant, i.e. if the year is a good predictor of the number of earthquakes with magnitude above 7.0 If he is correct, you'd expect the slope to be different from zero: β ≠ 0, if the claim is not correct, then the slope will be equal to zero: β = 0

The hypotheses are:

H₀: β = 0

H₁: β ≠ 0

α: 0.05

The statistic for this test is a student's t: $t= \frac{b - \beta }{Sb} ~~t_{n-2}$

The calculated value is in the regression output $t_{H_0}= -3.82$

This test is two-tailed, meaning that the rejection region is divided in two and you'll reject the null hypothesis to small values of t or to high values of t, the p-value for this test will also be divided in two.

The p-value is the probability of obtaining a value as extreme as the one calculated under the null hypothesis:

p-value: $P(t_{n-2}\leq -3.82) + P(t_{n-2}\geq 3.82)$

As you can see to calculate it you need the information of the sample size to determine the degrees of freedom of the distribution.

If you want to use the rejection region approach, the sample size is also needed to determine the critical values.

But since this test is two tailed at α: 0.05 and there was a confidence interval with confidence level 0.95 (which is complementary to the level of significance) you can use it to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis.

Using the CI, the decision rule is as follows:

If the CI includes the "zero", do not reject the null hypothesis.

If the CI doesn't include the "zero", reject the null hypothesis.

The calculated interval for the slope is: [-0.11; -0.04]

As you can see, both limits of the interval are negative and do not include the zero, so the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

At a 5% significance level, you can conclude that the relationship between the year and the number of earthquakes above magnitude 7.0 is statistically significant.

I hope this helps!

(full output in attachment)