The correct statement is that Sarah and Angelina worked to create change by advocating actively for abolition and women's rights. So, the correct option is D.
Sarah and Angelina were reform activists who worked to end the slavery system in their region, which happened to the women of the slave communities.
<h3>Woman Rights </h3>
- Sarah and Angelina cut their ties with their former community in order to spread their activism during the 1800s to the people of enslaving community.
- However, they both belonged to the enslaving communities and in order to continue their activism they had to sacrifice their religion as they believed in providing basic human rights to women.
Hence, the correct option is D that Sarah and Angelina worked to create change by advocating actively for abolition and women's rights.
Learn more about women rights here:
brainly.com/question/11014854
It is inductive reasoning: generalizing from a small sample to a bigger population. Deductive reasoning would be, if the sentences were in the other order. It's also not faulty, as it's not contradictory.
Answer:
A possible impact of this scenario is that country B will have high level of poverty. Resource distribution is the distribution of resources such as minerals, water, fuel, and wealth among similar geographic entities. Resources are important for the growth and survival of a population. When the distribution of resources is hindered or unequal in a particular area, it could result in poverty, preventable diseases, hunger, homelessness and illiteracy.
C) be willing to express allegiance to America.
