Answer:
This is an answer that requires a personal opinion. I will give you my opinion with an explanation so you can understand it and if you want, you can modify it.
Explanation:
I agree.
What this question proposes to us is that there is no absolute truth when it comes to morality.
There is no one truth about morality that applies to everyone as if it were a rule. And this happens because there are many sets of subjective norms, beliefs, values and customs that direct or guide the behavior of groups of people in society and that vary depending on each person.
Something that is moral for a certain cultural group may not be for another in another part of the world.
That is why in my personal opinion I agree that there is no objective 'truth' in morality. "
Answer:
a court of law
and a basketball court
Explanation:
those are the only kind of court i could think of
Answer:
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government.
Explanation:
The correct statements of federal preemption of state law under the Supremacy Clause include:
- A state law that requires documentation of citizenship is preempted by the National Voter Registration Act because the act only requires a statement under oath.
- A state's attempt to regulate television and radio is preempted by federal law because the federal government has regulated the entire field.
The Supremacy Clause is a provision in Article VI of the Constitution that states that the treaties and constitution laws of the United States are the supreme law of the land.
Under the Supremacy Clause, it should be noted that both state and local laws that conflict with federal laws are rendered invalid. The preemption in the <em>Supremacy Clause</em> is that <em>federal law</em> over state law.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25261982
