1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Akimi4 [234]
3 years ago
10

What was The first state to pass insurance legislation

Law
1 answer:
Lubov Fominskaja [6]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Massachusetts

Explanation:

You might be interested in
This type of tort does not require an intent to cause harm just an intent to do the act
kipiarov [429]

:Intentional torts are wrongful acts done on purpose. The person does not need to actually mean harm, but the other person ends up hurt anyway, such as in a prank. Or, the person can definitely mean harm, such as domestic violence cases

3 0
2 years ago
An officer grabs a reluctant suspect by the arm and escorts the suspect to the police
Leviafan [203]

Answer:

hard hand

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Yolanda and Rodney agreed that Rodney would paint Yolanda's home for $800, with Yolanda supplying the paint. Rodney went to Yola
Lady_Fox [76]

Answer:

Rodney should win the case because he showed up to do the work but Yolanda failed to perform her part of the contract (provide the paint).

The legal term used to describe Rodney's offer of performance is tender or attempted performance. In this case, Rodney (the promisor) went to Yolanda's house and offered to perform his painting services. Yolanda (the promisee) did not perform her part of the contract by not providing the paint, so the promisor was unable to perform. Since Rodney's non-performance was directly caused by Yolanda's non-performance, he is not liable for anything since Yolanda lost her rights because she breached the contract first.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I just wanted to try Brainly out and haven't used it and want my account refunded.
Ksju [112]
It’s fun , I love using it to check for the correct answers and see if anyone thinks like me
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Supreme Court case of Escobedo v. Illinois (1963) involved what legal right?
Neko [114]

Answer:

Explanation:

Illinois (1963) involved what legal right?

the right to have a lawyer present during police interrogation

the right to remain silent while being arrested by police

the right to expunge criminal convictions from the record after winning an appeal

the right to investigate a crime for which the defendant has been accused

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How often does apportionment of the House of Representative occur?
    15·2 answers
  • What is your opinion regarding marriage due to financial interest, power, status or social prestige? ”. Do you think that marria
    7·2 answers
  • What are the legal limits for public assemblies in the usa
    15·2 answers
  • Which other qualifications must a citizen meet before he or she can serve on a jury?
    7·2 answers
  • How does a judge become a part of the Supreme Court?
    7·2 answers
  • The first modern privatized jail was opened in what state? Tennessee California Arizona Delaware
    5·1 answer
  • Que es la participacion ciudadana
    7·2 answers
  • HELPPPPPPPPP WILL MARK BRAINLIST TO WHOEVER ANSWERS FIRST !!!!!!!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • what is the porpuse of law ? Is there a common core ,or does your answer differ for different type of society ? What is the rule
    14·1 answer
  • QUESTION 13
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!