1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna71 [15]
3 years ago
6

Before or chicken eggs before?

History
1 answer:
Tcecarenko [31]3 years ago
8 0
Answer:

Explanation:

Though I don’t think there is a definite answer for this but for me personally I believe that the chicken eggs comes before the chicken.

Just like how there’s no caterpillar there wouldn’t be butterfly. Or how human transform from monkey. Without egg there will be no chicken although the same thing can be said vice versus however, just like how the theory that human comes from apes (monkey) there could be possibility that chicken had also gone through some transformation of its own. In this case, egg has more possibilities because there are quite a lot of animal that produces egg including ducks, birds and more. And therefore creating a new species call “Chicken”. This is just a personal thought.
You might be interested in
HI FAMILY I NEED HELP FAST PLS THANK U AND IF CORRECT THERE WILL BE A BRAINLY TO THE FIRST TO ANSWER
kaheart [24]

During the reconstruction President, Lincoln’s plans or main topics were to Give Forgiveness to the South, the Ten Percent Plan, Thirteenth Amendment, and Freedmen’s Bureau. However, when Lincoln got reelected to start his second term John Wilkes Booth did not agree with Lincoln’s plans so Booth decided to kill Lincoln. After Lincoln died Vice President Andrew Johnson became the President. Johnson did not agree with all of the things Lincoln was trying to accomplish with the reconstruction. Johnson did agree to accept the end of slavery and to legally forgive the South. However, he did not provide aid to help former slaves (Freedmen) and he gave the states the power of their government.

 The Southerners did not agree with all of the reconstruction plans. They fought to keep the African Americans in a place where they felt they were still in slavery. Southerners did not agree with taking slavery and banning it however, with their government control they made it to where law enforcement was able to arrest African Americans and force them to work on Plantations. When voting came around Southerners did everything they could to prevent African Americans from voting. They made Poll Taxes which affected the poor people and they also made Literacy tests which affected the majority of African Americans because before the Civil War they were not given proper education. However, this also affected poor whites so the Southerners made the Grandfather clauses which stated that if before the Civil War your grandfather had full citizenship rights you were exempted from the Poll Tax and Literacy tests. This ensured poor whites could vote and the majority of African Americans were denied voting rights. I think that the reconstruction plans will eventually succeed but before they do the South will fight their hardest to ensure that African Americans feel like they are in slavery because that was the one thing the Southerners did not want to give up.

3 0
2 years ago
A person with a _____ is expected to earn an average of $52,200 each year.
Jobisdone [24]
It can be said that "<span>A person with a Bachelor's degree (option C) is expected to earn an average of $52,200 each year. This is an undergraduate academic degree given by colleges and universities by the end or completion of the study. Depending on the career it might last between three or seven years. </span><span />
3 0
3 years ago
How did technology affect World War II essay
Diano4ka-milaya [45]

Answer:

Technology had a massive effect on the outcome of World War 2. ... Aircraft were used extensively in large scale bombing campaigns during the war. Rocket technology was developed by Nazi scientists during the war, leading to the development of the first missiles - including the infamous V2 rocket.

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
PLEASE HELP WILL MARK YOU AS BRAINLEST
tangare [24]

I fully approve the idea of creating a legislative branch with two houses. First if we'd had only one house how would the states have been represented? By population? In that case the states with the largest populations would have all legislated solely in their benefit and often to the detriment of the states with smaller populations. Ok so we create a legislative branch with one house based only on equal representation of each state right? But the problem here is representation would then be of the state but we the people for of and by whom the government was being formed would have no direct voice in the legislative branch. A government that is directly responsive only to the people can devolve into rule by the mob such as we saw happen in France following their revolution. They had a unicameral legislative government the house of deputies and it was directly responsive to the people giving way to rule by the mob and the horrors that bred the reign of terror with thousands of people beheaded including children accused of being counter revolutionaries. There was no senior house to temper if you will the will of the people or take a longer view if you will of whats best for the nation as a whole. Our House of Representatives is suppose to be more parochial in its view they represent our will (or rather they are suppose to) the Senate is given a longer term and originally they were not elected by the people of their states but rather depending on the state either elected by the state's legislative branches or directly appointed by the state's Governor. US Senators as that house was originally constituted were suppose to be somewhat more independent from the people although not completely independent because they worked for the state not the people but the people to whom they were accountable were elected by the people of the state. During President Wilson's term in office he pushed for and got an amendment that made the US Senate (to his way of thinking more democratic). I personally think it reduced the US Senate to being more political by making the Senators more directly accountable to the people. More democracy is not always desirable as we can see from the experience of France and her reign of terror.  

I read a biography of John Adams this past summer. John Adams was the man who first pushed for a written Declaration of Independence and then after the Revolutionary War was over and he was a commissioner/ambassador from the United States to France and then England while the United States was operating and failing rapidly under the Articles of Confederation he pushed very hard for a bicameral legislative branch so the will of the people could be balanced by the long term good of the nation in the Senate. He was excoriated by Thomas Jefferson whom he'd been friends with if Jefferson ever really had friends for using the English parliment as his model for a legislative branch of government. Jefferson was in love with everything French and only disavowed the French Revolution long after the horrors of madame le gillotine and the reign of terror made it clear that the will of the mob needed to be tempered by cooler more rational minds who yes tended to be more conservative in their actions.  

I come from West Virginia we have barely 3 million citizens. We have three congressional representatives. New York for example has what forty six congressional representatives how could we feel comfortable knowing that we depend soley on the good will of larger states when questions before congress are being decided by large states only and the consequences of those decisions might fall soley upon the smaller states simply because they have essentially no voice in congress because of their small congressional delegations? A bicameral government not only protects the nation from being whipsawed by a very parochial house of representatives but the small states are protected at least somewhat each state being equally represented in the US Senate which is charged with being more concerned with what is best for the country than they are about what may be temporarily best for the citizens in their own states.

5 0
4 years ago
If you could live the live of someone else for a week who would it be?
Doss [256]

Answer:

Someone rich

Explanation:

to see if maybe people treat you different and to see if money is all that special.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the french revolution change the world
    15·1 answer
  • Why would education have led middle-class women to address societal problems?
    5·2 answers
  • Why was the development of mathematics important in Egyptian society?
    15·2 answers
  • The two party system in american leads to the creation of political parties that are
    8·1 answer
  • What percent of colombians are younger than age 15?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a problem that many urban Americans faced during the early 1900s?
    12·2 answers
  • How did the UFW's grape boycott help migrant workers?
    13·2 answers
  • Can the wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan be considered part of the Cold War?
    10·1 answer
  • How does the Fifth Amendment's guarantee of due process work?
    10·1 answer
  • How did the average English personis working hours change as a result of the industrial revolution
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!