Answer:
Please find attached detailed solution to the above question.
Explanation:
Please as attached detailed solution.
Answer: The answers are provided below
Explanation:
There are several similarities between the project management processes which surround scrum to the traditional project management processes which surrounds a project life cycle such as Waterfall. When one looks at each iteration as a project, one will see that Scrum planning meeting will be identical to planning meeting of the traditional project.
The daily standups in scrum will resemble the monitoring and the controlling of traditional waterfall with the exception that in scrum, its team monitors itself. A sprint would be the execution stage while the sprint review will be like project closure lessons that are learned. Sprint can be seen as small waterfall model project.
However, the main difference is in the scrum's team mindset versus the team of the traditional project management. Also, the process of work defining as being completed is different for the teams. Lastly, the method used by the scrum team in its approaches to work, team collaboration, responsibility acceptance, tasks definition and accountability are different from the traditional project management team.
A hybrid approach will be sensible in a large organization which has pockets of power. This is true for large retails that have old legacy systems in which frequent deployments aren't possible.
This is true for systems in which, testing can't be automated due to the fact that automated testing is a vital part for success for large scrum projects. In such organizations, it is sensible to use scrum for the teams which are able to move to scrum and waterfall can be used for other parts of the organization.
Answer:
Under/over applied overhead= $21,000 overapplied
Explanation:
<u>First, we need to calculate the predetermined overhead rate:</u>
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= 280,000/2,000
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= $140 per machine hour
<u>Now, we can allocate overhead:</u>
Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base
Allocated MOH= 140*2,400
Allocated MOH= $336,000
<u>Finally, the under/over allocation:</u>
Under/over applied overhead= real overhead - allocated overhead
Under/over applied overhead= 305,000 - 336,000
Under/over applied overhead= $21,000 overapplied
The court decided in favor of the McNamee because he did not have sufficient minimum contacts to establish personal jurisdiction, since Texas was not the focal point of the story.
Explanation:
The court gave his final decision in favor of McNamee. Clement has not received decision in favor of his though he suffered from distress and damage of his reputation in Texas. McNamee illustrated that he gave steroids to Clements who was an Texas citizen
Mc Namee was a citizen of New York. He did not have sufficient minimum contacts to establish personal jurisdiction. McNamee was a trainer. According to the national magazine there was no such detail of defamation was provided.