You could get two different functions out of this:
<u>2x + 2y = 8</u>
1). <u> 'y' as a function of 'x'</u>
Subtract 2x from each side: 2y = -2x + 8
Divide each side by 2 : <em> y = -x + 4</em>
2). <u> 'x' as a function of 'y' :</u>
Subtract 2y from each side: 2x = -2y + 8
Divide each side by 2 : <em> x = -y + 4</em>
Those two functions look the same, but that's just because the original
equation given in the problem was so symmetrical. In general, they're
not the same function.
Answer:
8x^2
Explanation:
First, do prime factorization of each of the coefficients:
32 ⇒ 2^5
24 ⇒ 2^3, 3
The greatest common factor (GCF) of the coefficients is 2^3 = 8.
Next, find the GCF of the variables:
x^2
x^2, y
The GCF of the variables is x^2.
Finally, multiply the GCF of the coefficients by the GCF of the variables to get:
8x^2
Given:
The radius of the cone = 14 ft
The slant height of the cone = 27 ft
To find the lateral surface area and the total surface area of the given cone.
Formula
The lateral surface area of the cone is
and
The total surface area of the cone is
where,
r be the radius and
l be the slant height of the cone.
Now
Taking r = 14 and l = 27 we get
sq ft
or, 
sq ft
Again,
sq ft
or,
sq ft
Hence,
The lateral surface area of the cone is 1187.5 sq ft and the total surface area of the cone is 1803.3 sq ft. Option C.
Answer:
Function:
c = f(w) = 0.49, 0 < w ≤ 1
= 0.70, 1 < w ≤ 2
= 0.91, 2 < w ≤ 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes, the relation described can be interpreted as a function.
Here, c is the cost of a mail letter. c depends upon w, which is the weights of the mail letter.
As described in the question, the relation can be expressed as a function.
c can be expressed as a function of w in the following manner:
c(cost of mail) = f(w), where w is the independent variable and c is the dependent variable
c = f(w) = 0.49, 0 < w ≤ 1
= 0.70, 1 < w ≤ 2
= 0.91, 2 < w ≤ 3
where, c is in dollars and w is in ounces.
Answer:
The correct option is;
Callie multiplied incorrectly
Step-by-step explanation:
Here we have 0.42 × 4.73 = 1.9866 then
1.9866 + 29.4 + 168 = 199.3866
Therefore, from the question, we had 0.42 × 4.73 = 1.26 which is incorrect, meaning that Callie multiplied incorrectly
Apparently, Callie multiplied as follows;
0.42 × 3 = 1.26 but what was in the question was
0.42 × 4.73 which is equal to 1.9866.
