We often hear of ancient stories that are intriguing. A setting where my character lives in Mesopotamia is written below;
- My name is Erish, It is a Mesopotamia name given by my parents and it means queen, lady. I was born and raised in the Nineveh, Mesopotamia during 615 Bc.
- My Daily living centers around the family. My family lived in a flat houses is was made with sun-dried mud bricks. I help my mum with house works and occasionally follows my parents to the farm. In my house, there is a courtyard, a garden and a lot of poultry birds such as chickens.
Mesopotamia is known to be a common place in history. I t is found in the middle of Euphrates and the Tigris rivers It is known as the present Iraq.
L earn more about Mesopotamia from
brainly.com/question/1110113
Almost all of them opposed child labor in the factory.
According to them, exposing a child (which physique still hasn't fully developed yet) to the factory's environment will be very bad for the child's well being
hope this helps
Answer:
Halo Effects
Explanation:
It is a cognitive bias. It works on the principle of the first impression is the last impression. It is also called physical attraction stereotype and "whatever is beautiful is good". It is the habitual characteristics of a person to rate a person on their physical attractiveness. The more attractive person gets more favor and the person who is not beautiful gets less favor. This term was coined by Edward in the 1920 s. Whenever we rate a person by his good looking, then we tend to believe that they are positive and good personality and more intelligent. Even in one of the study investigators found that people rate that the more attractive person found to be less guilty in criminal activity. It is a double-edged sword. Even good looking person also found guilty, dishonest, hard from heart.
I believe the answer is D: Early followers had different opinions about who would lead them.
After the death of Prophet Muhammad, nobody knew who would lead them again, and the religion split apart into two due to this.
According to npr, most of the Prophet Muhammad's followers wanted the community of Muslims to determine who would succeed him; a smaller group thought that someone from his family should take up his mantle.
<em>If this is incorrect, please, don't refrain to tell me. Thank you. </em>
Answer:
No, he didn't
Explanation:
Marx believed that the relationship between the lower class and upper class were exclusively beneficial for the upper class.
According to his perspective, Upper class owned the resources and employed the labors from the lower class. The profit that generated from that labor mostly will obtained by the upper class while the lower class obtain very little from it. On top of that, the sales of the product that created by the effort were mostly bought by the lower class citizens and trapped them in never ending cycle.
