A law stating that as the price of a good increases, the quantity demanded of the good decreases, and that as the price of a good decreases, the quantity demanded of the good increases.
Answer:
A person should never be passionately attached to the fruits of desire or else he will be enslaved. So, when he cannot satisfy his desire, he will become angry and in this way, <u>his soul will be concealed and his intelligent-will will be destroyed.</u> His soul will then become<em> inactive.</em>
Explanation:
"Reincarnation" refers to a soul's rebirth into a new body. This involves a process called <em>"samsara," </em>which is a<em> cycle of death and rebirth.</em>
As people live through life's different stages, they encounter certain desires. In Hinduism, such desires are normal and should<u> never be suppressed.</u> They should, however, be fulfilled through fair play and prudence. The "fruits of desire" can only be achieved if the person pursues his desire <u>without greed.</u> In this way, he'll be able to enjoy the fruits of desire.
The statements that supports Sue's position that judges should be elected is that Judges are representatives of the people in government just like other officials and should represent majority will.
<h3>How are the Judges choosen?</h3>
In the Judiciary, the justices are often nominated by the President and confirmed by Congress and once in office, the judges can remain in their positions for life.
In practice, the Judges are not elected rather, they are appointed because of the need to make them independent of external forces.
Hence, the statements that supports Sue's position that judges should be elected is that Judges are representatives of the people in government just like other officials and should represent majority will.
Read more about Judges nomination
brainly.com/question/7576271
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is:
Causation fallacy (Oversimplification or exaggeration fallacy)
This fallacy is also known as fallacy of reduction or multiplication
Explanation:
The oversimplification or exaggeration fallacy is used to appeal the fact that one single act would unchain several consequences of the same type without any cause to link it as a real proof of the possible occurrence. In this case, it is simple a prediction that is not based on any type of fact or scientific evidence to prove that this will certainly happen.
