Answer:
My argument is slightly, but not insignificantly, different.”
...
What is the opposite of considerably?
slightly little
insignificantly somewhat
barely hardly
moderately scarcely
marginally only just
the conversation during meal , the battle of Vicksburg relate to Annie not willing to give up on getting through to Helen . keller make reference of the battle in an effort to convince Annie that she should give up to trying to teach Helen anything and just accepted defeat
Fights over her color. Indifference due to her being a woman, and insecurities I think.
Explanation: good luck! sorry if i'm wrong
I had to type it this way due to the filter :((
Answer and Explanation:
Quaid-e-Azam defended an ideal of youth which he believed would bring good results to society and the country as a whole. For him it was necessary that young people did not get involved in political matters, nor let parties and politics influence their youth. Instead, young people should focus on their studies and build good academic knowledge, so that in the future, as adults, they have a good foundation and good reasoning to make their own political decisions. Unfortunately, today's youth have failed to follow the concepts of Quaid-e-Azam and have been increasingly influenced and often manipulated by politicians and parties, letting themselves be carried away, often by faux politics that even discourage knowledge and studies, based on fanciful and invented concepts.
Answer:
Number 1 is the opinion.
Explanation:
Number 2, Number 3, and Number 4 all are supported with sufficient evidence.
In Number 2, the passage refers to a real-life property, the "intellectual property", and therefore supports the sentence, providing a clear argument that the song is copyrighted.
In Number 3, the passage refers to judges and juries comparing different parts of the song. This is also what would happen in a real-life situation since copyright laws have strict policies equipped within them.
In Number 4, it provides an exact date to when the incident happened with Katy Perry and the people who have worked with her.
However, in Number 1, only because "the melody of the two songs sounding different" is not sufficient evidence for the audience to believe that the song is not copyrighted. More evidence is needed in order for this claim to be stronger.
Hope this helped!
~Jinachi~
