1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Solnce55 [7]
2 years ago
13

What happens to peoples religious beliefs when they study math and science?

History
1 answer:
Anettt [7]2 years ago
3 0
The relationship between science and religion has typically been characterized as one of conflict, especially on the issue of origins (creationism vs. evolution). The historical reality is that science and religion have more often been complementary to each other, and the relationship has been dynamic. With this definition in hand, he went on to argue that religion and science were inherently incompatible "because they have different methods of getting knowledge about reality, different ways of assessing the reliability of that knowledge, and, in the end, arrive at conflicting conclusions about the universe."
You might be interested in
What was happening in russia in the 1800s?
mestny [16]

Russia fought the Crimean War (1853-56) with Europe's largest standing army, and Russia's population was greater than that of France and Britain combined, but it failed to defend its territory, the Crimea, from attack. This failure shocked the Russians and demonstrated to them the inadequacy of their weaponry and transport and their economic backwardness relative to the British and French.

Being unable to defend his realm from foreign attack was a great humiliation for Tsar Nicholas I, who died in 1855 toward the end of the war. He was succeeded that year by his eldest son, Alexander II, who feared arousing the Russian people by an inglorious end to the war. But the best he could do was a humiliating treaty, the Treaty of Paris – signed on March 30, 1856. The treaty forbade Russian naval bases or warships on the Black Sea, leaving the Russians without protection from pirates along its 1,000 miles of Black Sea coastline, and leaving unprotected merchant ships that had to pass through the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits. The treaty removed Russia's claim of protection of Orthodox Christians within the Ottoman Empire, and it allowed the Turks to make the Bosporus a naval arsenal and a place where the fleets of Russia's enemies could assemble to intimidate Russia.

In his manifesto announcing the end of the war, Alexander II promised the Russian people reform, and his message was widely welcomed. Those in Russia who read books were eager for reform, some of them with a Hegelian confidence in historical development. These readers were more nationalistic than Russia's intellectuals had been in the early years of the century. Devotion to the French language and to literature from Britain and Germany had declined since then. The Russians had been developing their own literature, with authors such as Aleksandr Pushkin (1799-1837), Nicolai Gogol (1809-62), Ivan Turgenev (1818-83) and Feodor Dostoievski (1821-81). And Russian literature had been producing a greater recognition of serfs as human beings.

In addition to a more productive economy, many intellectuals hoped for more of a rule of law and for an advance in rights and obligations for everyone – a continuation of autocracy but less arbitrary. From these intellectuals came an appeal for freer universities, colleges and schools and a greater freedom of the press. "It is not light which is dangerous, but darkness," wrote Russia's official historian, Mikhail Pogodin.

And on the minds of reformers was the abolition of serfdom. In Russia were more the 22 million serfs, compared to 4 million slaves in the United States. They were around 44 percent of Russia's population, and described as slaves. They were the property of a little over 100,000 land owning lords (pomeshchiki). Some were owned by religious foundations, and some by the tsar (state peasants). Some labored for people other than their lords, but they had to make regular payments to their lord, with some of the more wealthy lords owning enough serfs to make a living from these payments.

Russia's peasants had become serfs following the devastation from war with the Tartars in the 1200s, when homeless peasants settled on the land owned by the wealthy. By the 1500s these peasants had come under the complete domination of the landowners, and in the 1600s, those peasants working the lord's land or working in the lord's house had become bound to the lords by law, the landowners having the right to sell them as individuals or families. And sexual exploitation of female serfs had become common.

It was the landowner who chose which of his serfs would serve in Russia's military – a twenty-five-year obligation. In the first half of the 1800s, serf uprisings in the hundreds had occurred, and serfs in great number had been running away from their lords. But in contrast to slavery in the United States, virtually no one in Russia was defending serfdom ideologically. There was to be no racial divide or Biblical quotation to argue about. Those who owned serfs defended that ownership merely as selfish interest. Public opinion overwhelmingly favored emancipation, many believing that freeing the serfs would help Russia advance economically to the level at least of Britain or France. Those opposed to emancipation were isolated – among them the tsar's wife and mother, who feared freedom for so many would not be good for Russia.

3 0
2 years ago
What is colonial economics
trasher [3.6K]

Answer:

I am explain you in image

3 0
3 years ago
Which Georgia region is the only region that has coal?
Rom4ik [11]

Hi,

Option A "the Appalachian plateau" is the correct answer.

In line-

Appalachian Plateau is the only region in Georgia that has coal.

<em>Hope</em><em> it</em><em> helps</em><em> you</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>pls</em><em> mark</em><em> brainliest</em><em> if</em><em> it</em><em> helped</em><em> you</em>

4 0
2 years ago
What statement about Roman slavery is TRUE? (W3.1.8) *
vova2212 [387]

Answer:

Slaves in the city had voting rights.

7 0
2 years ago
How did george w bush won the 2000 election?
igor_vitrenko [27]
By 4:30 a.m., after all votes were counted, Gore had narrowed Bush's<span> margin to under</span>2,000<span> votes, and the networks retracted their predictions that </span>Bush<span> had </span>won<span> Florida and the presidency. Gore, who had privately conceded the </span>election<span> to </span>Bush<span>, withdrew his concession.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Help im on timer ;-;
    6·2 answers
  • What were some of the leadership characteristics of george patton and douglas macarthur? do you think they had characteristics c
    12·1 answer
  • What was the greatest weakness of the interstate commerce commission when it was founded?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following contributed most to the growth of nationalism in the Balkans in
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not a key political thinker of the enlightenment
    15·2 answers
  • What were the aims of civil disobedience movement
    15·1 answer
  • What is your position on US involvement in world affairs? should the US intervene where it sees a need, or "mind its own busines
    6·1 answer
  • A cultural characteristic that Plateau Indians and Northwest Coast Indians had in common was....
    12·1 answer
  • What are the effects of the treaty of versailles on German people ( economic, social, personal and political effects.)
    6·2 answers
  • How did the northwest ordinance influence the expansion of the United States?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!