1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BartSMP [9]
3 years ago
6

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!

History
1 answer:
evablogger [386]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: the second one hopes that helps

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Unit Test
kykrilka [37]

Answer:

Add a bill of rights to the Constitution.

7 0
3 years ago
How did the outcome of French and Indian War lead to an increase in British policies (taxes) in the American colonies?
Basile [38]
  <span>In a word - taxes. Taxes to cover the expense of that war. 
Taxes were the single most important point of tension between the colonists and the British crown. 
Britain had spent 90 million pounds during the French and Indian War. 
The British felt that Americans should share the expense of the war which was fought in large measure for the protection of the colonists. 
Deficit spending was very undesirable in the thinking of economists at that time. To make up deficits in the treasury, the British added new taxes that the colonists rebelled against.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Why is Iran’s government classified as authoritarian?
BlackZzzverrR [31]

Since its founding in 1979, the Islamic Republic of Iran has dedicated considerable resources to constructing new international norms that reflect the practices, worldview, and aspirations of the ruling authorities in Tehran—all with the goal of enhancing its legitimacy and devaluing its domestic critics. From recasting the conventional principles of human rights and political participation to launching alternative international media and working to reshape and restrict access to the Internet, the Islamic Republic’s quest to forge counternorms is moving ahead unabated. In the course of these efforts, it seeks out global partners that share its agenda. Tehran has found Russia and China, in particular, to be useful role models, facilitators, and collaborators.

Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic, considered the very notion of “democracy” to be an undesirable Western concept. He insisted that “Islam itself is democratic” and set out to define Islam’s provisions for political life. In the infant days of the 1979 revolution, few dared to defy the icon of the anti-shah movement over a single word, allowing Khomeini to prevail in this matter. Iran thus became an “Islamic republic,” leading to an ongoing struggle to define the system’s republican character. Khomeini and his inner circle in the Islamic Republican Party quickly formulated the new polity’s characteristics, which over the years became the regime’s counter to democracy. Those who opposed the new constitutional arrangement, starting with Prime Minister Mehdi Bazargan in November 1979, were sidelined or imprisoned. Some, including the Islamic Republic’s first elected president, Abolhassan Bani Sadr, even fled.

Although the popular uprising against the monarchical dictatorship of Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi (1941–79) had been a rainbow movement with strong prodemocracy leanings, less than two years later Khomeini had installed himself as Iran’s supreme leader and “God’s representative on earth.” The democratic struggle had ironically produced an unabashedly illiberal theocracy that soon proved resourceful in its quest to survive, predatory in its political behavior, and unprincipled in its disposition. Before Ayatollah Khomeini died in June 1989, he cemented this Machiavellian approach by decreeing that the interests of the “Islamic Republic” superseded even the tenets of Islam. Thus the very few who can define the interests of the system, principally the supreme leader himself, were made invincible.

Two constant features have been part and parcel of the political process in Iran ever since: First, there has been a continuing struggle among key regime personalities, factions, and institutions to define, own, and defend the revolution of 1979 and “Iranian national interests.” Second, thanks to intense intraregime competition for influence—most visible in the violent schism that followed the disputed 2009 presidential election—the Islamic Republic has faced a hemorrhaging of support from within its ranks. Accordingly, although the regime has managed to consolidate its institutional grip, the system’s basic legitimacy is no more secure today than it was in 1979.

The regime’s many critics see Iran’s “Islamic democracy” as a façade that allows the current supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, to maximize control while making minimal concessions to a society hungry for genuine political rights. When President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad opportunistically began to challenge Khamenei during Ahmadinejad’s second term in office (2009–13), Khamenei publicly warned that the presidency could be eliminated altogether. The notion of “Islamic democracy” is perhaps the most blatant counternorm conceived by the Islamic Republic, but Ayatollah Khamenei is not stopping there

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does George Washington agree or disagree with becoming involved in world affairs?
joja [24]

Answer

Neutral i think

Explanation:

Washington recognizes that it is natural for people to organize and operate within groups such as political parties, but he also argues that every government has recognized political parties as an enemy and has sought to repress them because of their tendency to seek more power than other groups and to take revenge.

4 0
2 years ago
Hey, my little cousin asked me a question and i have no answer please help!
creativ13 [48]

Answer:

well actually in the Bible talked about giants ( the nephilim) in numbers 13 33 " and there we saw giants, the son of anak which come of the giants and we were in our own sight a grasshoppers and so we were in their sigh. and other part which I forgot the verse said there food was also big .

so I belive there where giant animals and are probably dinosaurs.

also in genesis it also talk that he made all animal . a dinosaur is also an animal.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • FLVS HISTORY:. How did the Reconquista act as a pull mechanism for Spain to explore and conquer new lands?. . The Reconquista cr
    13·2 answers
  • Match the following items
    11·2 answers
  • All of the following are true of special districts EXCEPT:
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a cause of the ottoman empire���s decline?
    9·1 answer
  • After the Glorious Revolution, the British monarch could not rule without the consent of Parliament. In addition, Parliament cou
    10·1 answer
  • Why do you think England, France, and Spain risked their best ships and
    13·1 answer
  • Political impact of vietnam war on us
    15·1 answer
  • I will gladly give brainliest to the one who helps me and has it correct, with a proper explanation!
    11·1 answer
  • A worker in which career pathway might need to memorize lines? Check all that apply.
    15·1 answer
  • Why do they think 9/11 caused such a large shift in the way<br> agencies communicated?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!