1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Inessa [10]
2 years ago
13

I GIVE BRAINLIEST Compare and contrast market-oriented and subsistence agriculture.

History
1 answer:
Dennis_Churaev [7]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Subsistence and Commercial farming are the two types of farming practices. Subsistence agriculture is performed by the farmer for the survival of his own and the person's dependent on him. On the contrary, commercial agriculture is nothing but an agricultural business, wherein crops are grown for trading purpose

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which was the first in a series of battles that would lead to the defeat of the German army?
Jobisdone [24]

Answer:it was the battle of Argonne Forest

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Imagine that you were one of the Little Rock Nine students. How would you feel in that situation?
ser-zykov [4K]

Hi there!


If I was in that situation. I'd feel very threatened and scared for my life considering the fact that the 2 different colored people always had rivalry, but I'd have to be brave and subside the worst of the worst and look forward to whats to come for a brighter future. Sure, theres going to be a lot of chaos before the better, but I guess thats how people get over the differences. Considering all the chaotic choices and decisions you can't help, but feel like an outcast. So, its sometimes best to watch out for your back in case for anything that says the word "wrong" is going to happen.

<em>I hope this is good enough</em>

-<u>WolfieWolfFromSketch</u>


4 0
3 years ago
What was one of the ways Mussolini controlled Italy?
OlgaM077 [116]
Mussolini used Facism
4 0
3 years ago
Explain how a factory owner would view capitalism
xenn [34]

Answer:

Economic theorizing

utilizes, on the one hand, mathematical techniques and, on the other, thought

experiments, parables, or stories. Progress may stagnate for various reasons.

Sometimes we are held back for lack of the technique needed to turn our stories

into the raw material for effective scientific work. At other times, we are

short of good stories to inject meaning into (and perhaps even to draw a moral

from) our models. One can strive for intellectual coherence in economics either

by attempting to fit all aspects of the subject into one overarching

mathematical structure or by trying to weave its best stories into one grand

epic.

This paper attempts to revive an old

parable, Adam Smith’s theory of manufacturing production, which has been

shunted aside and neglected because it has not fitted into the formal structure

of either neoclassical or neo-Ricardian theory. The paper attempts to persuade

not by formal demonstrations (at this stage) but by suggesting that the parable

can illuminate many and diverse problems and thus become the red thread in a

theoretical tapestry of almost epic proportions.

The subject may be approached from either

a theoretical or a historical angle. Regarding the theoretical starting-point,

it is possible to be brief since the familiar litany of complaints about the

neoclassical constant-returns production function hardly bears repeating. The

one point about it that is germane here is that it does not describe production

as a process, i.e., as an ordered sequence of operations. It is more like a

recipe for bouillabaisse where all the ingredients are dumped in a pot, (K, L),

heated up, f(·), and the output, X, is ready. This abstraction

from the sequencing of tasks, it will be suggested, is largely responsible for

the well-known fact that neoclassical production theory gives us no [204] clue

to how production is actually organized. Specifically, it does not help us

explain (1) why, since the industrial revolution, manufacturing is normally

conducted in factories with a sizeable workforce concentrated to one workplace,

or (2) why factories relatively seldom house more than one firm, or (3) why

manufacturing firms are “capitalistic” in the sense that capital

hires labor rather than vice versa.

5 0
2 years ago
1995 2093
9966 [12]

Answer:fwafafaf

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • In 1964 which controversial event gave the U.S. a reason to expand its military involvement in Vietnam?
    12·1 answer
  • There were no cave paintings created in Africa during prehistory.<br> True or False
    7·1 answer
  • If jonny don't brush his teeth in three days what can happen inside his mouth?
    11·2 answers
  • Discuss how government, business and labor work together to promote wartime production and how the war affected each group.
    14·1 answer
  • What name did the pro slavery rebel states take on when they broke from the United States? A. Dixie B. The Mason-Dixie line C. T
    8·1 answer
  • Drag each individual to the correct category.
    8·1 answer
  • What did Patrick Henry say to American legislatures about taxes?
    11·1 answer
  • True or false? the framers of the constitiution studied the ideas of political writers from the past in order to avoid their mis
    7·1 answer
  • How did the Assyrians use the technologies of the Hittite people for their own gain
    9·2 answers
  • True or false<br><br> The moon is the only satellite that earth has
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!