All categories

3 years ago

Does the preamble to the Declaration of Independence indicate reasons why the new independent government might

Law

2 answers:

sweet-ann [11.9K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The best possible answer in this case is B, but that is not entirely correct.

Explanation:

Any premise for overthrowing an independent does not come from the preamble to the Declaration of Independence, but rather the second body paragraph. The Preamble merely states that the 13 colonies had reason to remove themselves from Britannia rather than explain that there are reasons for nations and states to seceed from others.

alisha [4.7K]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The answer is B.

Explanation:

I got it right on edge.

You might be interested in

Some say the world will end in fire,

IRISSAK [1]

Answer:

iambic is the answer

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Sarah grows rosebushes that she decided to sell online. She has done this for ten years. Is Sarah a sole proprietor?

Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Sarah work alone in her own business so, Yes Sarah is a sole proprietor.

A sole proprietor is an individual who owns and operates an independent business.

Sarah produces rosebushes' flower that she sells on the internet with help of online market and websites . She's been doing it for ten years.

So, from the above definition we can say that Sarah is a sole proprietor.

Learn more:

brainly.com/question/14280034?referrer=searchResults

4 0

3 years ago

Choose the option that best matches the description given.

Ket [755]

Answer:

records release

Explanation:

it is an agreement to release records

7 0

3 years ago

Discuss the legalities of using ruses and pretexts to gain confidential information regarding a target from sources. What are

marin [14]

Pretexting is the act or practice of gaining information about a subject by misrepresentation or under false pretenses. Pretexting is capable to leaving companies involved open to liability claims

The need to understand when pretexting is illegal within federal and state laws, how pretexting has been interpreted by the courts, the type of pretexting that are legal but also not advisable, as well as steps to take against being pretexting when investigative tasks are outsourced

The use of pretext to obtain telephone records or financial information is explicitly against federal law and pretexting used for criminal purposes are stopped by prosecutors using other existing federal laws

However, pretexting in the form of undercover investigation is completely legal, provided the investigator does not present them selves as a person of authority

Learn more about using ruses and pretexting to obtain confidential information here:

brainly.com/question/9321150

brainly.com/question/14049478

8 0

3 years ago

I was lead to believe that Democracy was rule by the majority, that members of parliament were there to represent the wishes of

sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

the same ammount of the persons beleiev in democrats can vote

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago