1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mariulka [41]
3 years ago
11

Does the Bible say anything about standing up for yourself if you believe that the judicial system is not being fair or right

Law
2 answers:
Anuta_ua [19.1K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

no its says to stand up for those who cant stand up but ethier way if u wanna stand up for that then do it you dont have to follow it we sin but be you

Explanation: Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy.”

Papessa [141]3 years ago
6 0
Scripture never says to do anything for YOU, for yourself. But in the case of doing what’s right you should always stand up for the truth if the system is corrupt.
You might be interested in
Why is sociology relevant in the 21st century
e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

The value of sociology to 21st century education derives from the scientific approach used to answer social and cultural questions. The skills necessary to conduct sociological research–critical thinking, analytical processing and writing–are highly marketable skills in the modern economy.

8 0
3 years ago
How many of the original thirteen states must ratify/approve the constitution for it to take effect?.
fiasKO [112]

Nine states of the original thirteen states had to ratify the Constitution for it to go into effect.

<h3>What is constitution ?</h3>

A constitution is a collection of guiding ideas or accepted precedents that serve as the foundation for a polity, organization, or other sort of body's legal system and frequently specify how that institution is to be governed.

<h3>Who was the Constitution ratified?</h3>

Nine of the thirteen State legislatures needed to ratify it in order for it to go into effect; unanimity was not required. Two groups came into being during the Constitutional debate: the Federalists, who favored adoption, and the Anti-Federalists, who opposed it.

<h3>What was the purpose of ratifying the Constitution?</h3>

The necessary purpose of the ratifying conventions was to acquaint the populace of the proposed new government's provisions. They also served as platforms for supporters and opponents to discuss their positions in front of the public. Notably, state conventions rather than Congress served as the ratification's agents.

To know more about legislatures visit :

brainly.com/question/2880693

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
Giving out some points :)
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

Lol

Explanation:

Thank u so much ;)

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is not a court of limited jurisdiction? a. probate court b. small claims court c. federal district court
Debora [2.8K]

Answer:

d. All of the above are limited jurisdiction courts.

Explanation:

Probate courts have limited jurisdiction surrounding a person's death, such as matters regarding the settlement of the deceased person's assets.

Small claims courts have limited jurisdiction to hear minor civil claims between private litigants.

Federal courts can only hear cases authorized by the United States Constitution or federal statutes, therefore limited.

7 0
3 years ago
Which operational end of the spectrum do you think our current criminal justice system is positioned closer to: due process or c
julia-pushkina [17]

Our current criminal justice system is positioned closer to the due process model operational end of the spectrum.

<h3>What is the due process model of criminal justice?</h3>

The due process model of criminal justice is a system, which focuses upon the rights of the defendant. It presumed that defendants are innocent until proven guilty.

It is the liberal approach of the criminal justice system which basically favors the rights of the criminals.

In the due process model, the first priority of the court is to protect the constitutional right of the accused.

Learn more about the due process model of criminal justice here:-

brainly.com/question/13765102

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Are there any parallels between demonological theories of crime and current society?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the executive branch of Florida is headed by?
    13·1 answer
  • For criminologists, social structure includes only the physical features and landscape of a place.
    8·2 answers
  • Why do you think it is difficult for heterogeneous cultures like the United States to agree on definitions of crime and deviance
    12·1 answer
  • Hello Dana Sides (Log out if this isn't you.)
    10·1 answer
  • What happens it a state court disagrees with a federal court?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a violation of military law?
    12·2 answers
  • Deductive Reasoning starts with a general statement hypothesis or theory.<br> True<br> False
    5·2 answers
  • Describe both types of coverage as well as the minimum required amount for each
    5·1 answer
  • Please help, i will give brainliest to the right answer
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!