Based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
This is because, before the agreed date of 20th August, X withdrew her acceptance and sent it by post and also made a call to Y which informed him of her current stance.
<h3>What is a Contract?</h3>
This refers to the legally binding agreement that exists between two or more people about the terms of something.
Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
Notwithstanding the arrival of the postal letter of acceptance, this is considered void as there has been a change of terms that have been clearly communicated to the other party.
Read more about contract here:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
Answer: In response to conflict surrounding state governments that arose during and after the Civil War, states wrote longer constitutions. But by the late twentieth century, states seeking greater governmental efficiency usually shorted their fundamental law. Texas, however, continues to buck that trend favoring bigger over better.
Explanation:
Turn it in when you get to the station and get it back to the right person
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The process of discovery required in the federal court under the initial disclosures Rule 26(a) requires that in the absence of a court order or provision, or an objection by a party during the conference, the initial disclosures should be exchanged within or at 14 days after the completion of the Rule 26(f) conference, while in the state of California, given that responses are not continuous, interrogatories can made towards the discovery cut-off date
