Answer:
Nowadays, people can easily access endless news platforms thanks to technological advancement and the popularity of 4G networks. However, have we considered the possibility that a piece of news can have completely different versions? I think this has a lot to do with fake news, which has led to social unrest in many parts of the world.
Most importantly, society is usually split between two camps: pro- and anti-government. In such a situation, some reporters may try to cover up the truth for their own political gain, which makes people question the media industry. But people who are not trained to think logically can be easily misled by fake news.
They live in an “echo chamber”, a kind of social media environment in which opinions are likely to be approved of because they will only be read by people who hold similar views. Such people may become angry with those who think differently. This can cause division in the community, which is not a good thing.
In a time when we can spread and receive information quickly, media literacy is very important. But it is the duty of media organisations to crack down on fake news and focus on the “real news” for the sake of a peaceful society.
We should not believe everything people say. What comes out of their mouths don’t matter much as long as we think critically and act sensibly. Then we can steer ourselves in the right direction.
Angela Chan, Leung Shek Chee College
Explanation:
Work Cited From, "Yuhan Huang | 21:09pm, 27 Sep, 2020"
Ignore the administrative procedure act to streamline proceedings
Answer:
a map is a flat representation of earth's curved surface. however transferring a curved surface to a flat map results in a distorted image of the curved surface. the three-dimensional curved surface of a globe is called a map projection. no projection is an entirely accurate representation of earth's surface.
Explanation:
In a series of Supreme Court rulings under Chief Justice Earl Warren, beginning with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, "separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional because new research demonstrated that separating students by "race" was detrimental to them, even if facilities were equal.
<h3>Which Supreme Court decision caused the separate but equal concept to be abolished?</h3>
- The separate but equal theory was abolished as a result of the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court ruling.
- The 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. Board of Education, which overturned the "separate but equal" principle and ordered an end to school segregation, is one of the most well-known decisions to come out of this time period.
- "Separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional in a series of Supreme Court decisions made under Chief Justice Earl Warren, starting with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, because new research showed that dividing students by "race" was harmful to them even if facilities were equal.
- "Separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional in a series of Supreme Court decisions made under Chief Justice Earl Warren, starting with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, because new research showed that dividing students by "race" was harmful to them even if facilities were equal.
To learn more about the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court, refer to the following link:
brainly.com/question/9822748
#SPJ4
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over kidnapping cases is a false statement.</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
<em>Federal court</em> is a place where people are held at the court and discussed and justice is given to the deserved ones. In this process the results are concluded according <em>to the facts and evidence. </em>
And according to the <em>mistakes and misconduct</em> conducted by the individuals are punished accordingly. The law is equal for all the people and the rules applies even for the <em>prime minister or King of the country. </em>
