Dred Scott Vs. Stanford case was heard in Supreme court of US which issued its final ruling saying that Africans whether free or slaves were not the citizens of US.
Explanation:
Dred Scott who is a plaintiff and a slave was bought by John Emerson in Missouri. Later Emerson came along with Dred Scott to Illinois where Scott married and as they were returning to Missouri, Emerson died. Now Dred Scott decided to sue for his freedom in the federal court. He claimed he was free as he lived in the free state.
Robert Taney who was the chief justice issued the land mark decision that African american though free or slave were not the citizen of US and hence Dred Scott had no right to sue in the federal court. Dred Scott lost his case and this ruling was condemned universally as one of the racism based verdicts which paved way for the amendments of the statutes pertaining to the rights of African Americans.
Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
Trilemma is a very difficult situation, were you have to chose from 3different options that are actually, and most times seems equal. In these situation, it is quite better to have 2 choices and having to choose one, compared to having three choices that all seems equal, so option A best describe trilemma.
Poverty simply means not having enough money that can be used to meet basic needs such as food, clothing and shelter.
Poverty is the major cause of human trafficking. It's because of poverty that there's a rise in human trafficking.
People want to have better lives and travel to places where there'll be an improvement in standard of living. This has led to the rise of human trafficking.
Poverty can drive people to become traffickers, drive parents to sell their children into slavery. Those suffering from poverty are usually targeted by traffickers as a means of exploitation.
Answer:
Move closer to in-group
Explanation:
It is believed according to social identity that behavior of individuals can be changed by organization if the organization can first modify the self-identity of the individuals. Hence, it claims that when people with different social identity are put together in a group, the we-group will mover closer to in-group others who perform more poorly than we do on an important task, when the group identity is salient.
B,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,b,bb,b,b,b,bb,b,b
