1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tamiku [17]
3 years ago
10

Giving away another brainliest!!

Law
2 answers:
jasenka [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Yayyyyyy

Explanation:

Thank you so much for being a good Brainly citizen!

Vadim26 [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Ooooo thank you for the points :)

Have a good day

You might be interested in
What is Conciseness and provide a real-life example of law enforcement using conciseness when implementing technical writing?
Cerrena [4.2K]

Answer:

Conciseness means brevity and completeness. The entire underlying premise of “Elements of Style” (and the purpose of this section on “conciseness”) is captured in the mantra of Will Strunk's Rule #17: “Omit needless words, omit needless words, omit needless words.”

Explanation:

can i get the crown please

6 0
3 years ago
Boyd files a suit in a federal district court against Cathy. Cathy loses the suit, appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
ikadub [295]

Answer:

not required to hear the case.

Explanation:

The United States Court of Appeals  is also known as the circuit courts that are the intermediate appellate courts. The US courts of appeals are one of the most powerful as well influential courts in America.

In the context, Boyd flies a case against Cathy in the federal district court where Cathy loses the case. She then makes an appeal to the circuit courts or the United States Court of Appeals for a second circuit but she loses again. Now if Cathy moves to the Supreme Court of the U.S. and makes an appeal, the Supreme Court is not required to hear Cathy's case as she already made an appeal in the Court of Appeals of U.S. and The court has made his judgement.

4 0
3 years ago
In 1988, as a result of a general election, Arizona added Article XXVIII to its constitution, Article XXVIII provided that Engli
MrMuchimi

Answer:

Yes.  Article XXVIII  of the Arizona constitution is a violation of Maria-Kelly's freedom of speech as enshrined in the first amendment to the US Constitution.

Explanation:

The first amendment to the constitution guarantees Maria-Kelly freedom of speech.  Therefore, to force Maria-Kelly not to speak Spanish to some Spanish-speaking persons with whom she dealt in the course of her work is an abridgment of her right to self-expression.  Conclusively, Article XXVIII clearly violated her constitutionally protected free speech rights.

8 0
3 years ago
Why is it so hard to score here​
Rasek [7]

Answer:

To be honest, I don't know, you have to answer questions.

6 0
3 years ago
A glass rod becomes positively charged when it is rubbed with
liberstina [14]

Answer:

lose electron

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Nevada is single and provides a home for his girlfriend, Lois, and her 5 year old daughter Corky. Lois worked in a bakery and ea
    5·1 answer
  • your own words explain how The fourth amendment helps protect the people from the government abusing their power.
    8·1 answer
  • HELP
    8·1 answer
  • What can the government do to reduce juvenile delinquency?​
    15·1 answer
  • Which is characteristic of an exit wound?
    11·1 answer
  • 1. Write short notes Welfare Fund under Labour Rules, 2049.​
    11·1 answer
  • What court case determined that a person cannot be required to disclose his or her political association in order to be licensed
    9·1 answer
  • What is the term for the reelection system in the senate where only one-third of the senators every two
    11·1 answer
  • Does anyone else wanna quit brainly yes or no?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the purpose of the fair credit billing act and the electronic fund transfer act.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!