Answer:
Explanation:
Noah’s good behaviors are that he always lets his boss know when he gets to the office and he first catches up on all his emails so he doesn’t leave anyone hanging. He also works very hard before lunch. Although he does all these good thing he does a few bad thing like being t minutes late everyday after lunch and being on social media when he is supposed to work. He also neglects the safety regulations and leaves 10 minutes early. He should have come back on time after lunch and he should consider the safety regulations. And also he should leave on time when his office is finished, not before.
Answer:
Anthropogenic climate changes stress the importance of understanding why people harm the environment despite their attempts to behave in climate friendly ways. This paper argues that one reason behind why people do this is that people apply heuristics, originally shaped to handle social exchange, on the issues of environmental impact. Reciprocity and balance in social relations have been fundamental to social cooperation, and thus to survival, and therefore the human brain has become specialized by natural selection to compute and seek this balance. When the same reasoning is applied to environment-related behaviors, people tend to think in terms of a balance between “environmentally friendly” and “harmful” behaviors, and to morally account for the average of these components rather than the sum. This balancing heuristic leads to compensatory green beliefs and negative footprint illusions—the misconceptions that “green” choices can compensate for unsustainable ones. “Eco-guilt” from imbalance in the moral environmental account may promote pro-environmental acts, but also acts that are seemingly pro-environmental but in reality more harmful than doing nothing at all. Strategies for handling problems caused by this cognitive insufficiency are discussed.
Explanation:
Answer:
what about the other part of the question that shows you options to pick from?
