Answer:
A researcher starts with a theory, forms a hypothesis, makes observations, and then analyzes the data to confirm, reject, or refine the original theory.
Explanation:
Deductive approach to research involves developing a hypothesis and eventually carrying out a research to test the hypothesis in order to prove or disprove an already existing theory. On the contrary, inductive approach in research is aimed at developing a new theory from data collected from a research.
The correct answer is "Should all people late for important meetings ignore crosswalk signals?"
The concept of categorical imperative was developed by the German philosopher <u>Immanuel Kant</u>, as the central concept of his deontology, an aspect of moral philosophy that deals with duties. Kant's goal was to define a way to assess the motivations for human action at all times in life. An imperative would be any proposition that declares a particular action as necessary, based on this notion Kant divides the imperatives into two categories: categorical and hypothetical.
Those maxims that would be acceptable as a universal law, and can be considered adequate motivation for human action, would be categorical imperatives, implying an absolute and unconditional demand. This cannot be disobeyed, no matter the circumstances, being an end in itself, that is, no other purpose can justify disobedience and the categorical imperative needs no other justification. Unlike hypothetical imperatives, which have application when we want to achieve a certain end, for example, if we want to acquire knowledge, it is imperative that we learn. The hypothetical imperative is linked to the end, or the purpose, desired by the one who acts, thus facilitating the decision of what the correct action to take, is hypothetical because, once the agent has no interest in accomplishing that end, or not the necessary action is taken to carry it out, there is no obligation to follow it. In this sense, it is optional and conditioned to our inclinations.
The immigrants brought positive changes to the United States due to:
- Brought their gastronomy.
- Incresing the labor capacity of the country.
- Learning different cultures.
<h3>
Positive Changes by
Immigrants</h3>
Although the people regularly talk about the negative aspects about the immigrants, must be remembered the immigrants bring many positive changes, like their food, due to in United States can be eaten sushi, pizza, tacos and other types.
On the other hand, with more people, the labor capacity of the country is increased to work in different areas, at the same time the Americans can learn about different cultures in the world in our same country.
More information about Immigrants:
brainly.com/question/1289110?referrer=searchResults
Answer: by using local property taxes to fund public schools, trapping poor children in poor schools
Explanation: Jonathan Kozol is an American writer, educator, and activist best known for his publications on public education in the United States. In savage inequalities, Kozol pointed out how students from poor family background are trapped in poorly funded schools since public school funding comes from local property taxes which vary widely between communities.
The basis of Kozol's argument is the comparisons between rich and poor school districts, in particular the amount of money spent per child. School districts with relatively wealthy property-owners are spending over $20,000 per year per child while school districts where poor people live spend about $11,000 per year per child.
The pertinent question he asks is whether it is fair or right that the place of one's birth or residence should determine the quality of education a child is entitled to.
