Answer:
b) households will save more because they will expect higher taxes in the future
Explanation:
The Ricardian Equivalence proposition is one of the pillars of classical economics, which sadly has proven to not work very well in the real world. According to classical economists, and their quantity theory of money plus the Ricardian Equivalence, recessions do not exist because it is impossible for them to exist. But in the real world, that is not true. Recessions exist, e.g. the US is in a recession since the first quarter of 2020 (even before the current health crisis). When real people lose their jobs or are afraid to lose their jobs, their spending habits change.
On the other hand, when real people get a tax refund or tax cut, they generally spend it, they will not save it to pay future taxes. That is why car sales increase during February after checks form the IRS are handed out.
Theoretically, classical economics is great. The problem is that we are human beings, and as such, our behavior cannot be controlled or determined by what we should or should not do. This is exactly why the velocity of money (quantitative theory of money) is not constant.
Answer:
Option (d) , Bank 4 offers the highest amount after a year
Explanation:
The total amount from each of the interest rates can be expressed as;
A=P(1+r/n)^nt
where;
A=Future value of investment
P=Initial value of investment
r=Annual interest rate
n=Number of times the interest is compounded annually
t=number of years of the investment
a). Bank 1
P=x
r=6.1%=6.1/100=0.061
n=1
t=assume number of years=1
replacing;
A=x(1+0.061/1)^(1×1)
A=x(1.061)
A=1.061 x
b). Bank 2
P=x
r=6%=6/100=0.06
n=12
t=1
Replacing;
A=x(1+0.06/12)^(12×1)
A=x(1.005)^12
A=1.0617 x
c). Bank 3
P=x
r=6%=6/100=0.06
n=1
t=1
Replacing;
A=x(1+0.06/1)^(1)
A=1.0600 x
d). Bank 4
P=x
r=6%=6/100=0.06
n=4
t=1
A=x(1+0.06/4)^(4×1)
A=x(1+0.015)^4
A=x(1.061)
A=1.0614 x
e). Bank 5
P=x
r=6%=6/100=0.06
n=365
t=1
A=x(1+0.06/365)^(365×1)
A=1.0618
Option (d) , Bank 4 offers the highest amount after a year
Answer:
- Difference in scientific judgements
- A. Employers should not be restricted from outsourcing work to foreign nations.
Explanation:
The difference in opinion between these two is based on a difference between in scientific judgments because they believe that different things will happen in response to implementing a different form of taxes.
Regardless of what they think in the above regard, these economists are most likely to support the outsourcing of work if it is cheaper to do so because economists generally believe that the most efficient method of production should be undertaken.
Answer:
3. 5,110,000 and 5,170,000
Explanation:
Number of shares to be used in computing basic earnings per share
= 4800000*12/12 + 200000*9/12 + 4800004/12
= 4800000 + 150000 + 160000
= 5,110,000
Number of shares to be used in computing dilute earnings per share
= 4800000*12/12 + 200000*9/12 + 4800004/12 + (6000000/1000)*40*3/12
= 4800000 + 150000 + 160000 + 60000
= 5,170,000
Therefore, The number of shares to be used in computing basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share on December 31, 2018 is 5,110,000 and 5,170,000.
Answer:
The person with Absolute advantage is the one that produces more of a good than the other.
<em><u>Dina </u></em><em>has an absolute advantage in the production of alfalfa, and </em><em><u>Charles</u></em><em> has an absolute advantage in the production of barley. </em>
The person with Comparative Advantage is the person who produces something at a lower opportunity cost.
Charles Opportunity Costs
Producing Alfalfa gives 12 bushels per acre instead of 6 bushels for Barley.
Producing 1 Alfalfa means 6/12 = 0.5 bushels Barley is given up
Producing 1 bushel of Barley means 12/6 = 2 bushels Alfalfa is given up.
Dina Opportunity Costs
Producing Alfalfa gives 15 bushels per acre instead of 5 bushels for Barley.
Producing 1 Alfalfa means 5/15 = 0.33 bushels of Barley is given up
Producing 1 bushel of Barley means 15/5 = 3 bushels of Alfalfa is given up.
<em>Charles's opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of barley is </em><em><u>2</u></em><em> bushels of alfalfa, whereas Dina's opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of barley is </em><em><u>3</u></em><em> bushels of alfalfa. Because Charles has </em><em><u>lower</u></em><em> a opportunity cost of producing barley than Dina, </em><em><u>Charlie</u></em><em> has a comparative advantage in the production of barley, and </em><em><u>Dina</u></em><em> has a comparative advantage in the production of alfalfa.</em>
