The person watching television won't question what the see/hear, and they'll start to believe everything on their TV.
Answer:
A moral dilemma is shown here
Explanation:
Starting with the last word, <em>perfidy </em>is a deliberate breach of faith or trust; in the context of war - we can assume that this the case because of the word <em>peace</em><em> loving country</em> - perfidy can actually lead to warcrimes, like waving a white flag and then kill the enemy.
So the moral dilemma is that a country is very likely to be uncomfortable with a pact, the other side probably being a bit of a war loving country, but diplomatic relations deny the possibility of breaking the pact.
The part <em>not wishing to take the initiative of breaking the pact </em>is, if I´m not mistaken, a subordinate adjective clause that refers to the noun <em>country</em>.
So this country, not wishing etc., could not resort to perfidy either. Because that would be even worse, considering the fact that it is a peace loving country.
The answer to this would be the word train!
Answer:
Once upon a time, there were a two person family who lived out in the woods. The father took great care of the son. The father was a Botany, but had retired because of his age. But still he loved plants and grew a garden. The garden included Giant Bird of Paradise, Carnations, Irises, and ofc roses. He loved plants so much that he went out to dig a hole and plant different flowers and plants every spring. When the son grew older he helped the father with the garden. Two years later his son was accused of murder, but the body wasn't found. Next spring came and the father went out to dig. He couldn't Finnish it. He called his son and say he couldn't do the garden thing, because of his age. The son said don't dig there that's where he hid the bodies. The police came to dig the holes and try to find the bodies, but none of them were found. The father called the son again, and the son said thats all I can do for you right now.
Explanation:
Let's look at each statement:
A. <u>The setting of this story is good things can come, even in difficult situations.</u> True. This is a message of hope we can draw from Leo's story.
B. <u>This story is set in the future.</u> False. Leo mentioned "American World War II pilot". It means that the story takes place in that period of time (in the past).
C. <u>The setting of this story may affect the main character's values and actions.</u> True. The pilot still found great joy with some local orphaned children after a hard experience. It means that the meeting has changed the main character.
D. <u>This story does not have a geographical setting.</u> False. Leo mentioned "on a remote jungle island near Japan."
