Robert believes that the lengths 8 in, 13 in, and 20 in will form a triangle. Is he correct?
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
B.
Step-by-step explanation:
If you simple this expression we can see that 7/35 will simplify to 1/5 first. As for the exponents, you can write them out to make it easier to cancel, shown in the photo.
Complete Question:
Attached below as picture.
Answer:
From first graph there is no linear pattern so here linearity assumption violated.
From second graph there is observation is in some pattern like funnel or v shape so there is no constant variance occur that is there is no constant variance for error.
Constant variance for error occur when in residual plot all observation are in scatter everywhere.
From third graph we can say there is positive distribution but for regression analysis we need symmetric that is normal distribution.
Step-by-step explanation:
See graphs attached below.
Hey there!
In order to solve this problem, we can use the Pythagorean Theorem, which is . Since the Pythagorean Theorem would find only half of the length of x, we'll need to double it in the end.
First, let's plug in what we know to the Pythagorean Theorem:
Next, we'll simplify to that is by itself:
Then, we'll find the square root of 2.45, multiply that by 2 and round to the nearest tenth:
Therefore, x = 3.1 ft.
How to round to the nearest tenth:
In a decimal, the tenth is the first number after the decimal point. To round to the tenth, if the number in the hundredth place is less than 5, you keep the number as it is, but if the number in the hundredth place is more than 5, you increase the number in the tenth place by 1.
Hope this helps!! :)