1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xxTIMURxx [149]
3 years ago
7

Express your views on how the law, the citizen and community can

History
1 answer:
iren2701 [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

On the support of victims of human rights violation, the law should clearly state and express the repercussions of violating human rights. The citizen on the other hand should be well versed with human rights and should report any violator of human rights to the relevant authorities for immediate action to be taken. The community can mobilize and make aware the people of their rights and also allow any victim of human rights violations to face the law and seek justice.

Explanation:

hope this helps

You might be interested in
Before it became a U.S. state, eastern Oklahoma was set-aside for what?
KatRina [158]

D. As "Indian Territory" for thousands of Native Americans displaced from the southeastern United States.

Explanation:

Most of Oklahoma was set-aside as "Indian Territory", as the United States government wanted to move the Native Americans from their tribal lands in order to expand.

The Indian Removal Act was passed in 1830, which meant the Native Americans had to move from their homes and go to the territory that was for them in Oklahoma. They obviously did not want to go, but many knew that they would not stand a chance against the United States government.

Years later, some of the Cherokee Natives were still there and were not moving, this caused the United States military to get involved and had to force them out. Native Americans were walked at gunpoint all the way to Oklahoma, this walk is known as the Trail of Tears. Thousands of Natives died of diseases, starvation, and weather conditions during this walk.

3 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP 98 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jobisdone [24]

1. Pope Urban calls for the First Crusade. At the council of

Clermont, Pope Urban decided to call for the first crusade in 1095. Urban’s

call came from the desire to stop the Turks from westward expansion. This

decision came as a result of the Byzantine Emperor’s plea to send military

assistance due to the larger and larger threat of Turkish expansion.

2. Major rulers refuse to support the war. Due to their

issues with the Pope, both Philip I of France and Emperor Henry IV refused to

support the Pope’s desires in the crusade to come. What is odd about this is

that although they won’t participate, noblemen from their own countries will.

They would also be joined by many soldiers from areas of Italy and Germany as

well.

3. Crusaders take Jerusalem. After a siege of the city, the

soldiers of various nations managed to enter Jerusalem where the Turks were

eliminated indiscriminately. People of other religions such as Jews and Eastern

Christians also suffered losses due to the nature of the Crusaders’ attacks.

With this victory, the Kingdom of Jerusalem is established which makes the area

belong to Christians once again.

4. The second crusade called by Pope Eugene III. After the

fall of Edessa, Pope Eugene called for the second crusade to end the Seljuk aggression

and expansion. The crusade ended badly for the Crusaders as an Islamic victory

managed to keep them out of the territory and prevent them from establishing an

independent Edessa once again.

5. Henry and Philip join forces to start a new crusade.

Following the failure of the second, Henry of England and Philip of France

joined forces in order to start a new crusade with the goal being recapturing

Jerusalem from Saladin. Although they had many victories, the ultimate goal of

conquering Jerusalem ultimately failed, causing the Treaty of Jaffa and the

cease of hostilities.

6. Crusaders join forces once again for the same cause.

Following the failure to recapture Jerusalem, the fourth crusade began led by

forces from the Holy Roman Empire and the republic of Venice. Since they were

supported by the current Pope, they also managed to get the support of the

Christian world which more than 20 000 soldiers.

7. Crusaders turn on Byzantine. Although the goal of the fourth

crusade was capturing the city of Jerusalem, in the middle of the Crusade the

crusaders decided to switch their goal and attack the Byzantine Empire. What

nobody expected became true and they managed to sack the city of

Constantinople, which was a huge victory for Venetians who had bad relations

with Byzantine for years before this clash.

8. The Crusader spirit starts to dwindle. Due to numerous

losses during the previous crusades, the support for a holy war started

diminishing rapidly. This led to a series of future crusades that were not

successful at all and which had almost no support. This included the fifth,

sixth, seventh, and eight crusades, all of which were nowhere near the size of

the first four.

9. Ninth crusade ends it all. In what became known as the

final crusade, the Christian world lost yet again after an initial series of

victories. However, the crusaders were eventually forced to withdraw and leave

the area just as it was before the war began. Considering nobody wanted to join

the crusades anymore, this event goes down in history as the final large

crusade.

10. Small incursions run rampant. Throughout the history of

the crusades, numerous smaller crusades occurred which weren’t even named

according to the ordinal numbers. These were mostly smaller skirmishes that did

not influence the tides of war much. They usually occurred during the same time

as the ordinal crusades, but were at different places and led by different

people.

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/8626981#readmore

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is true about British rule in India?
Anna [14]
"Mahatmas Gandhi led revolution with peaceful demonstration" and "The British split India into two countries" are the ones among the following that is true about British rule in India. The correct options among all the options that are given in the question are the second and the third options. I hope it helps you.
6 0
3 years ago
Using the Internet, find one image that represents the views of government of Aristotle, one image that represents the views of
krok68 [10]
I'll give you some thoughts on the political views of the thinkers named. It's up to you to search for images and write your descriptions.

Aristotle believed there were three valid types of government, depending on the size and scope of what was to be governed or upon local situations. (He studied the constitutions of various governments as part of his work in writing <em />his work, <em>Politics.</em>)  As state with a sole ruler ruling rightly is a monarchy.  If that form of state is abused, it becomes tyranny.  A state with a number of members of the ruling class is an aristocracy -- rule by the excellent ones, noble men suited for governing.  If it is corrupted by having a few rule but not of noble character or in a noble way, Aristotle referred to that as an oligarchy (rule by a few).  A state in which all worthy men participate in governing Aristotle termed a polity, a constitutional government.  He saw it as a corruption, though, to have a full democracy (rule by the people), which would become the sort of thing we call mob rule.

Aquinas picked up thoughts from Aristotle, who had favored a monarchy.  Aquinas, writing from a Christian perspective, wrote about the righteous and proper sort of ruler who would serve as God's appointed leader among the people, truly caring for them (not becoming a tyrant).

Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx were partners in establishing communism as a political ideology.  Engels and Marx believed that in time, class struggles between overlords and those beneath them would give way to a society in which all ruled and lived and worked collectively.
3 0
3 years ago
1. How did the Nazi's use terror to rule Germany?
ratelena [41]

Answer:

1. The Nazis created a terror-state. This was achieved through intimidation and brutality. Those living in Germany were too scared to disobey Nazi laws.

Hitler used a number of organizations to uphold and extend his control of Germany.

2. The Nazis tried to make Germany self-sufficient - that is to produce all the goods it needed without having to rely on imported supplies. They called this policy 'Autarky'. The Nazis implemented a major programme of public works, such as building and repairing roads, railways and houses

3. I cant figure out this one

4. Attempts at modifying public opinions, attitudes, and beliefs range from advertising and schooling to “brainwashing.” Their effectiveness is highly controversial. We demonstrate that Nazi indoctrination––with its singular focus on fostering racial hatred––was highly effective. Germans who grew up under the Nazi regime are much more anti-Semitic today than those born before or after that period. These findings demonstrate that beliefs can be modified massively through policy intervention. We also show that it was probably Nazi schooling that was most effective, and not radio or cinema propaganda. Where schooling could tap into preexisting prejudices, indoctrination was particularly strong. This suggests that confirmation bias may play an important role in intensifying attitudes toward minorities.

5. I dont know sorry!

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the New Hampshire colonies main source of income?
    15·2 answers
  • How did the United States handle problems with France and Spain?​
    13·1 answer
  • What are good facts of how colonist won the British?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a major reason why the reform movement in Iran stalled in 2004?
    8·1 answer
  • What kinds of conflicts resulted from the global confrontation between the two superpowers?​
    13·1 answer
  • In 1936 the same year this propaganda was published, Germany occupied the Rhineland (land that was taken away from Germany follo
    13·1 answer
  • Race, social position, and gender play large roles in shaping our identities
    15·1 answer
  • What helped French settlers form an alliance with native Quapaw near the Arkansas Post? The French and Quapaw both opposed the S
    7·1 answer
  • Answer the questions in the picture please 100 points if you do
    13·1 answer
  • I want to know about the history of The Siege of the International Legations
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!