Considering how large of a GDP the US have, I would agree with such a move. There's several reasons why I would agree on such a move. One of them is of course the well being of the nature, as it is crucial for the survival of every living organism, including the humans. Reforestation will bring in lot of benefits that will gradually return the investment. For starters, the air quality will improve, and by doing so, the health problems among the people will reduce significantly, thus much less will be spent on healthcare. Part of the new forests can be fruit forests, which will be an enormous reserve of organic food without having to use any labor or effort in production. Also, by establishing forests, whole ecosystems will get back on the scene, so lot of useful plants can be harvested from the forests, such as herbs and mushrooms. If the US makes a deal so that it can use certain part of the benefits from the forests until it gets its enormous investment, it will be a win-win situation for everyone. In order to have the budget for the global reforestation, it would be the best to cut down on the budget for development of weapon of mass destruction and the budget for war.
<span>Movements of tectonic plates create volcanoes along the plate boundaries, which erupt and form mountains.</span>
A) is not the answer because we use nearby resources as an important factor in the site and growth of cities.
B) is not the answer because we need to be able to go and trade with other cities, or countries.
C) is correct because people don't use the prevailing wind direction as an important factor in the site and growth of cities.
D) is not the answer because we need to be able to defend our city or country.
So the correct answer is C)
Hope I helped.
There are three mountains: the Sierra Madre Occidental, the Sierra Madre Oriental, and Sierra Madre del Sur.
