Answer:
1. The author uses the words "undefined", "unbounded" and "immense" to describe the powers of the constitution.
2. Upset: it makes the Congress even more powerful than it’s previous long list of expressed powers
3. A Bill of Rights is necessary to protect the rights of citizens. The proposed Constitution does not do enough.
4. Yes he does, and it matters because if you don’t trust the people in power you wouldn’t have a real nation.
5.He seems more like an Anti-Federalist.
Part Two
1. Unnecessary and dangerous
2. From the Federalist No.84
3. No because he believes that its unnecessary and not needed in the constitution.
4. That the bill of rights is pointless and not realistic for the American people.
5 He is defiantly Anti-Federalist; He goes against everything Federalism is for.
Answer:
This idea of the Roman code is currently reflected in the USA through the federal constitution.
Explanation:
The relevance of the federal constitution today within American society reinforces the idea that people should be governed by laws rather than by the whims of leaders. This is because the constitution has the ability to establish all laws that need to be followed and obeyed within the country, in addition to limiting the power of the leaders, preventing them from governing the country according to their whims and not according to the law and the order.
He encouraged Panama to rebel against Colombia
2 because it explains better
Missiles. Soviets developed ICBM could reach U.S. and carried nuclear weapons, space, CIA used U-2 aircraft that flew so high they couldn't be shot down but was shot down in 1960.
