Answer:
Explanation:
To share a brief understanding of experts, who is an expert, an expert is considered, someone who has enough experience to carry put a particular task, he or she understands the possible scenarios and problems that might likely affect a system. While a non expert is someone, not that he doesn't understand the system, he might but not in details ,not enough experience unlike am expert.
So from the above analogy between experts and non experts ,it can be deduced that the method and approach to work from an expert will be more detailed because the possible scenarios of the task, he very much understands it buh a non expert, thou he might understand the task , but the approach to the system might be difference. An expert will potentially go straight to the point of the task, and even before starting the task already has a full knowledge of the problem compared to am non expert that might nor have a general knowledge of the task buh approaching the task with just confidence of previous works related to such task. I believe from the few points I have been able to point out the differences between an expert and non expert.
These are a couple things you could choose!
<span>1. if the EU comes up to change the applicant country's laws with silly reasons, while the all EU member countries have the same laws,
2. if the EU supports a reactionist party in the applicant country's government and is against to close this illegal reactionist party naming the closing action as undemocratic,
3. if the EU member countries support a terrorist organization and press the applicant country about it in the name of human rights (of terrorists)
example; Turkiye
Turkiye shouldnt become a member of this union under these unfair circumstances...</span>
It is a old practice where a young girl is offered to the temple
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Employees that have been fired or layed off or injured are thier own problems but with a its not the employee's fault so they would get the compensation fund
