Answer:
✔ Asking employees questions helps develop their critical thinking skills.
✘ Asking employees questions boosts their morale by helping them feel like experts, even though they’re not.
✘ Asking employees questions enhances their sense that the manager is the only person they should be in dialogue with, so they start talking less to each other.
✔ Asking employees how to solve problems empowers them to arrive at solutions to which they’re committed.
Explanation:
A manager who asks questions with a sincere interest in the answers is engaging in dialogue similar to a “regular” back-and-forth conversation, and this authenticity builds trust and promotes the open exchange of ideas. Another key benefit is that having employees think about questions, rather than just telling them information or telling them what to do, engages their critical thinking skills—which are key skills for organizational success. Also, when employees are asked how to solve problems, they are likely to have more buy-in to the solution they arrive at than to a solution imposed on them. Many people are motivated by feeling as though their ideas make a positive difference.
Lower-level employees are often the experts in operational details and often have more direct contact with customers than higher-level managers, so they have tremendous expertise that can and should be tapped. Asking employees questions begins an organizational dialogue that can lead to a decentralized communication network, in which employees freely exchange ideas with one another and not just with their manager.
Answer:
<u>e. All of the above.</u>
Explanation:
Interestingly, all the above-listed options could serve as a possible reason why Amazon allows products sold by others to appear on its site.
<em>Remember, </em>Amazon is a marketplace;<em> </em>since the definition of a market involves dealings with several entities, it thus logical to expect Amazon to allow people (other sellers) to transact on its platform.
Answer: No, because all of the defendant's facilities and offices are in State A.
Explanation:
Following the information given in the question, a federal district court cannot have subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's action.
In this case, there's no subject matter jurisdiction by the court as theres subject matter jurisdiction when there is full diversity of citizenship, and the amount of controversy is more tha $75,000.
Answer:
A. True
Explanation:
Manager need to employ their negotiating skill in different areas.
And the subject of negotiation written are all correct
Answer:
$3,849.87
Explanation:
The change in balance is the net of the receipts and the payments.
The receipts include the receivables and the interest paid by the bank while the payments include the outgoing expenditure and bank charge.
Balance change
= $16,590 - $12,730 -$12.50 + $2.37
= $3,849.87
