Hem sen Sharma or as he is often known Hemu, ruled the Indian subcontinent for about 2 months in an interim takeover.
Explanation:
Hemu was one of the most trusted generals of the Suri dynasty when they took over the rule of the Indian subcontinent from the mughal Humayun who was promptly forced into exile.
When the Suri ruler died and his son too was found to be weak, many people asserted Hemu to crown himself as a ruler as he was a strong leader and so he did.
He would eventually lose his life in battle to Akbar and thus his reign ended very swiftly. So his rule during the turbulent period only lasted for about 2 months and then he was largely forgotten.
Yes because <span>A </span>formal amendment<span> to the USA </span>constitution can<span> only be made by a vote of 2/3 of each house of congress and then by the legislatures of 3/4 of the states, or by a</span>constitutional<span> convention. Once that happens the </span>constitution<span> is changed, and the new provisions are law, just like the rest of the </span>constitution<span>.
i got this from </span>www.quora.com
<span>The author, Ron Chernow, presents Hamilton as an overly ambitious man but his ambitions were motivated not by egocentric deeds but by passion and determination to build the foundations of American success and prosperity. Clearly, his actions were influenced by ambition and not by principle. This is expressed in one example as written by Chernow, “To repudiate his legacy.” Another is “in many ways, to repudiate the modern world.” </span>
Needing the land and disease is your answer
