I hope this answers your question..
The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment. The majority noted that freedom of speech protects actions that society may find very offensive, but society's outrage alone is not justification for suppressing free speech.
In particular, the majority noted that the Texas law discriminated upon viewpoint, i.e., although the law punished actions, such as flag burning, that might arouse anger in others, it specifically exempted from prosecution actions that were respectful of venerated objects, e.g., burning and burying a worn-out flag. The majority said that the government could not discriminate in this manner based solely upon viewpoint.
Answer:
Ecom Hire Cars was set up three years ago by my brother-in-law.
Answer:
some people have requested data policy and program of the value rates and return to that they did not achieve anything on the contribution towards the growth of national consequences cannot be played an important role in organising in organised manner of wisdom of who tried to monitor the people and nationalism played and efficient in the way of United national prepared the base base for radical movement with their knowledge and training of political appear as if they were awarded to the national movement of a higher level there was a lot of that I was here to
Explanation:
as as a Congress
