The answer is A) roman common law
Answer:
im not 100% sure im understanding the question correctly but go gonna go with you are the employer. :)
Explanation:
Laws explain observations. Laws are factual statements.Give brainliist!!!!!!!!!!! Which statement is correct about Kepler's laws of planetary motion
Congress attempted to grant this power to the president by the Line Item Veto Act of 1996.
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
The congress of the United States of America has granted certain powers to the president to nullify the part of the bill and that is called line item veto. This can also be termed as partial veto.
The line item veto will give powers to the president to cancel certain provision in the bill and namely budget appropriation bill without vetoing the entire legislative bill.
Supreme Court of America as ruled that it is unconstitutional and it stated that Line Item Veto Act of 1996 has violated the fundamental principle of the presidential clause of the constitution.
The advice that should be provided to the bank manager about the pitfalls of accepting security from Wisteria's parents, including the necessary precautions the bank should take, include:
- The bank should ensure that it provides adequate explanations to Wisteria's parents about the nature of the overdraft and the financial state of Acme Pty Ltd.
- The bank should further explain the limitations of the guarantee involved with respect to the mortgage of the home.
- The bank should discover if Wisteria's parents' home is under another mortgage.
- The bank should take precautions that it does not fall into the pits that the classical case of Commercial Bank of Australia v. Amadio by not indulging itself in unconscionable conduct with the parents of Wisteria.
<h3>What is unconscionable conduct?</h3>
Unconscionable conduct is harsh conduct that goes against good conscience.
Unconscionable conduct is usually described as oppressive without considering its unfairness.
Thus, in seeking Wisteria's parents to mortgage their home to the bank, the bank manager should be careful not to mingle its business dealings with persons who lack the capacity to enter into a valid guarantee for Acme Pty Ltd.
Learn more about unconscionable conduct at brainly.com/question/13720902
