1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nitella [24]
3 years ago
13

How have other countries benefited from US influence

History
1 answer:
anygoal [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

very great

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution address the question of American Indians?
goldenfox [79]
To regulate commerce with foreign nations,and among the several states, and with Indian Tribes
6 0
3 years ago
If a country lowers tariffs, what will most likely happen?
Kruka [31]
Trades will increase
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were both nobles and knights obligated to do?
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

Provide personal and military service to the king

Explanation:

In feudalism land donations and titles were presented in as a present for support and army service. Several nobles were considered to serve as knights, whereas more nobles were considered to preserve military authorities. Under the nobles, knights were placed and below them were the peasants.Kings preferred loyalty to the nobles and aristocrats were designated for the responsibility of the king's assurance, and farmers used to assist with the food.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List three things about the Hittites that we still do not know much about. Explain why historians don’t know more about this civ
ValentinkaMS [17]

Explanation:We still need to learn more about the religion, government, and downfall of the Hittite civilization. The reason historians don’t know much about this civilization is because either the Hittites were not very good at record keeping or the records were destroyed.

6 0
4 years ago
What is the purpose of the document of undelivered speech​
steposvetlana [31]

Answer: am not sure this is the answer but try it

Explanation:I seek no confrontation. I only pray and will strive for a genuine national reconciliation founded on justice.

I am prepared for the worst, and have decided against the advice of my mother, my spiritual adviser, many of my tested friends and a few of my most valued political mentors.

A death sentence awaits me. Two more subversion charges, both calling for death penalties, have been filed since I left three years ago and are now pending with the courts.

I could have opted to seek political asylum in America, but I feel it is my duty, as it is the duty of every Filipino, to suffer with his people especially in time of crisis.

I never sought nor have I been given assurances or promise of leniency by the regime. I return voluntarily armed only with a clear conscience and fortified in the faith that in the end justice will emerge triumphant.

According to Gandhi, the willing sacrifice of the innocent is the most powerful answer to insolent tyranny that has yet been conceived by God and man.

Three years ago when I left for an emergency heart bypass operation, I hoped and prayed that the rights and freedoms of our people would soon be restored, that living conditions would improve and that blood-letting would stop.

Rather than move forward, we have moved backward. The killings have increased, the economy has taken a turn for the worse and the human rights situation has deteriorated.

During the martial law period, the Supreme Court heard petitions for Habeas Corpus. It is most ironic, after martial law has allegedly been lifted, that the Supreme Court last April ruled it can no longer entertain petitions for Habeas Corpus for persons detained under a Presidential Commitment Order, which covers all so-called national security cases and which under present circumstances can cover almost anything.

The country is far advanced in her times of trouble. Economic, social and political problems bedevil the Filipino. These problems may be surmounted if we are united. But we can be united only if all the rights and freedoms enjoyed before September 21, 1972 are fully restored.

The Filipino asks for nothing more, but will surely accept nothing less, than all the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the 1935 Constitution—the most sacred legacies from the Founding Fathers.

Yes, the Filipino is patient, but there is a limit to his patience. Must we wait until that patience snaps?

The nation-wide rebellion is escalating and threatens to explode into a bloody revolution. There is a growing cadre of young Filipinos who have finally come to realize that freedom is never granted, it is taken. Must we relive the agonies and the blood-letting of the past that brought forth our Republic or can we sit down as brothers and sisters and discuss our differences with reason and goodwill?

I have often wondered how many disputes could have been settled easily had the disputants only dared to define their terms.

So as to leave no room for misunderstanding, I shall define my terms:

1. Six years ago, I was sentenced to die before a firing squad by a Military Tribunal whose jurisdiction I steadfastly refused to recognize. It is now time for the regime to decide. Order my IMMEDIATE EXECUTION OR SET ME FREE.

I was sentenced to die for allegedly being the leading communist leader. I am not a communist, never was and never will be.

2. National reconciliation and unity can be achieved but only with justice, including justice for our Muslim and Ifugao brothers. There can be no deal with a Dictator. No compromise with Dictatorship.

3. In a revolution there can really be no victors, only victims. We do not have to destroy in order to build.

4. Subversion stems from economic, social and political causes and will not be solved by purely military solutions; it can be curbed not with ever increasing repression but with a more equitable distribution of wealth, more democracy and more freedom, and

5. For the economy to get going once again, the workingman must be given his just and rightful share of his labor, and to the owners and managers must be restored the hope where there is so much uncertainty if not despair.

On one of the long corridors of Harvard University are carved in granite the words of Archibald Macleish:

“How shall freedom be defended? By arms when it is attacked by arms; by truth when it is attacked by lies; by democratic faith when it is attacked by authoritarian dogma. Always, and in the final act, by determination and faith.”

I return from exile and to an uncertain future with only determination and faith to offer—faith in our people and faith in God.

Basahin sa Filipino

4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which provisions of the Compromise of 1850, proposed by Senator Henry Clay, favored the SOUTH?
    11·2 answers
  • Explain the struggles that presidios faced. Why do you think a Spanish soldier would take on such a difficult job
    14·2 answers
  • In 2012, the Public Relations Society of America reached a common definition for public relations. Which of the following repres
    8·1 answer
  • What dis the war powers resolution of 1973 do?
    15·1 answer
  • Population growth during the Gilded Age was due in large part to
    12·1 answer
  • In which part of your presentation should you provide background information Ask a thoughtful question or offer an interesting f
    13·2 answers
  • The prehistoric group of nomadic hunter, gatherers that used tools like the Clovis point.
    5·1 answer
  • Why was herbert hoover blamed for the great depression
    6·1 answer
  • Describe three negative effects the Civil War had on the economy of Texas.
    5·2 answers
  • As a result of the French Revolution of 1791 and the Napoleonic Wars, people most wanted
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!