Answer:
I will sell u the computer by saying that is one of the best computers in my day.
Answer:
D. Should Shut Down
Explanation:
A perfect competition firm is at profit maximising equilibrium where : Marginal Revenue [Price] = Marginal Cost .
If MR > MC : Firm's additional production is profitable, it tends to increase production. If MR < MC : Firm's additional production is loss making, it tends to decrease production.
However, If firm's Price i.e MR < Average Variable Cost : The firm's per unit price is even unable to cover it's per unit average variable cost. This situation is referred to as 'Shut Down' point & firm should close down its production in the case.
Given : MR = P = 3 ; MC = 4 ; AVC = 3.5 . The firm's price P (3) is not only lesser by its Marginal Cost MC (4), to decrease production ; but also lesser than its Average Variable Cost AVC (3.5) . So, the firm should shut down.
in this case, identical changes in autonomous consumption and autonomous government spending: <span> have different effects on equilibrium income
When a factor is implemented and have two different reaction, it is safe to assume that that factor have two different effects.
For example, an increasing interest in technology(autonomous consumption) may increased the investment for tech products. The government spending may not give as much influence in this context because it wont affect the transaction between the customers and the producer
</span>
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that when allocating funds, the firm should probably assign the highest cost of capital to division Z because it is most likely the riskiest of the three divisions. This is because Division Z focuses on research and development which means that they might not actually discover or create something that can bring value to the company and is therefore highly risky.