The staff would hopefully say "Sorry the doctors not in right now thank you buh bye" and then id maybe go comando and leave to live in a tent or if i answered id maybe say "i had no idea he/she never gave me any signs of this behavior before i dont know what to say but this is a case of bipoler issuse or drug abuse and maybe a bit of depression he/she was nit willing ti share with me." something like that :P
<span>Some
protestant leaders considered the use of religious images as a form of idolatry
and pushed for its removal and instead concentrated on Protestant ideals. Catholic art on the other hand, were used a
form of visual education for believers.
Their art was meant to venerate God and the saints which is why they
gave deep emphasis on their artwork.</span>
I WISH YOU HAPPINESS EVERY DAY TOO :)
This is a hard one to answer. The reason is that you are asked to distinguish between 2 schools of thought that are very close together. Not only that, but the characteristic you are looking for is not mentioned in either description.
Since semiotics brings in many more fields of study than does iconography, then I would go with iconography. This school of thought seems content just to find the symbols according to its description. What is done with them is mentioned in the other school but is not elaborated upon.
My answer would be iconography.
The movie had a few scenes that were just made for the 3-D effect. All that sliding around on the rooftops and gutters and sewer pipes on the ice... pure Hollywood time wasting stuff.
<span>I have read the book 15 times. I bought the CARREY film for my children. If you will give me a day or two, I will watch it again and make a long list. editing this maybe Monday (come now, Christmas is on Sunday..) </span>
<span>Oh yes, there were NO scenes with mice on the floor in the original story. </span>
