I believe the answer is B
Answer:
bc it isnt less than or equal too
Explanation:
Painting in the renaissance was most commonly done as fresco or murals painted onto plaster walls. For frescos pigments were mixed with water and directly painted onto the wall. However some artists did paint on wood using tempera paints which are pigments that use egg yolk as a binder
There's not just one "thesis statement" and "argument" for <span>cubist style of art. </span><span> There's a veritable infinity of approaches you can take here. </span>The traditional stance is that <span>cubist style of art </span><span>revolutionized European painting and sculpture, and that it was a part of the avant-garde art movement. </span>One less traditional stance would be that<span> cubist style of art</span><span> was essentially a creative cul de sac that didn't contribute anything lasting to European painting and sculpture. </span>
Here's one thesis statement: "<span>Cubist style of art</span> - a pre-WWII style that still thrives today"
Hope it helps
