Answer and Explanation:
Jusnaturalist School: According to this school, a law must, above all, directly address the promotion of justice in any type of situation, respecting the maximum natural right of the individual, which is an inalienable right that must be respected at any cost. . Based on this school, the situation shown in the question above is inadmissible, as it does not promote justice, it prevents innocent people from traveling via respecting their religion and still hurts their natural right.
Teleological School: This school has a strong political character and states that a law that achieves a social balance and promotes and is the service of protection and promotion of policies that protect society, it is valid. In relation to the case shown in the question above, this school can claim that the law is correct, since there have already been many cases of terrorism caused by Muslims, making their ban on boarding a promotion of social security.
2. When analyzing these two schools of legal thought in relation to the case shown in the question above, I came to the conclusion that the Jusnaturalist school is the one I most agree with. This is because prohibiting Muslim women from boarding an airplane because of terorist cases that they were not part of is a strong example of religious prejudice and intolerance, in addition to hurting the rights of innocent women.
Answer:
Civil acts right of 1991
Explanation:
The civil acts right enforces laws to prevent unfair treatment during employment and on the job due to sex, race, color, religion, national origin, disability, or age. Passed by Congress in 1991, this act advocates for fairness in employment matters and banned discrimination against the disabled in employment.
This preferential treatment of Jacqueline by Robert because she is African American goes against the 1991 civil act right.
Answer:
1) rights 2) freedoms 3) responsibilities 4) duties
Answer:
well, the correct first act would be to file a noise complaint, but for the answers given, I would choose D.
Explanation:
A. to sue bates for money damages would be not smart as there is no evidence that he did any damages. he's just using a noisy lawn mower.
B. Bates did not commit a crime as far as we know. unless they have filed multiple complaints, this is just a simple agitating thinghe's doing.
C. to present a signed petition seems a little far-fetched. I belive this would be the correct thing to do if this continues. but the amount of time it would take to get all of the votes it wouldn't even be worth it at the end.
with all of those rolled out, the best answer Is D.
please make me brainliest.
Answer:
Theories of punishment can be divided into two general philosophies: utilitarian and retributive. The utilitarian theory of punishment seeks to punish offenders to discourage, or "deter," future wrongdoing. The retributive theory seeks to punish offenders because they deserve to be punished.
