Answer:
Option b
Step-by-step explanation:
To represent this proportion using fractions, let the numerators be the number of waffles sold and denominator, the number of sugar cones.
Thus, the proportion that can be used to represent the cone sales is
14/6 = 7/3
27+6(2*2-1)4*2-5
2*2=4
27+6(4-1)4*2-5
4-1=3
27+6(3)4*2-5
6*3=18
27+(18)4*2-5
18*4=72
27+(72)*2-5
72*2=144
27+(144)-5
27+144+171
171-5=166
So the answer is 166.
Carlos is correct
Since we don't know the length of sides PR and XZ, the triangles can't be congruent by the SSS theorem or the SAS theorem, and since we don't know the measure of angles Y and Q, the triangles can't be congruent by the ASA theorem, the SAS theorem or the AAS theorem. Therefore, Carlos is correct.
Carlos is correct. Since the angles P and X are not included between PQ and RQ and XY and YZ, the SAS postulate cannot be used, since it states that the angle must be included between the sides. Unlike with ASA, where there is the AAS theorem for non-included sides, there is not SSA theorem for non-included angles, so the triangles cannot be proven to be congruent.
($35.50-$13) divided by $1.50=$22.5 divided by $1.50=15 rides
you can go on 15 rides.
