Client's relating to the psychoanalyst in ways that reproduce or relive important relationships in the individual's life; occurs in psychoanalysis when the analyst begins to assume a major significance in the client's life and the client reacts to the analyst based on unconscious childhood fantasies.
Source:
https://quizlet.com/167510767/therapies-ex-3-flash-cards/
Answer:
Explanation:
Allan Wicker discovered a couple of things during his research in 1969. First of which was that student attitudes about cheating did not predict their own cheating behaviors
. Secondly he discovered that Individual descriptions of racial attitudes did not predict behaviors in an actual situation
. Lastly, he found out that Individual attitudes about church attendance did not predict their own Sunday attendance. All of which were examples from the study that he conducted and the results that were gathered.
The direct democracy or pure democracy it´s a form of democracy in which the people directly decides on policy initiatives, it differs from the representative democracy; the one that it´s currently established in the majority of the countries; because in that the people choose the representantives and they are those who decide the policies to carry on. In the representative democracy the people do not govern, it´s a common mistake to mix both concepts.
Two different forms of direct democracy are participatory democracy and deliberative democracy. The deliberative democracy is a form in which the deliberation it´s a central matter to the decisions and it is seen as an amalgalm of the direct and the representative democracies. It holds that for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by an authentic deliberation not a mere voting.
The participatory democracy is one that emphasizes the broad participation of everybody but it demands to the citizens to be more involved in the political participation.
I think that a group taking a vote on something is an example of a participatory democracy because everyone have the same power to create consensus and, at last it would win the iniciative that obtain more votes. If the example was a representative democracy then the group would have to vote for only one person to make a decision and then the group will follow the "leader" choice althought it goes against the majority of what the group wants.
I hope the answer to be useful for you. Regards.
