1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sloan [31]
3 years ago
6

The city council allocates funds for road repair. Which circumstances would be a positive externality?

Law
1 answer:
kherson [118]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: Citizens spend less money repairing punctured and torn tires.

Explanation:

A positive externality is the economic benefit that is enjoyed by the third party that may or may not had contributed for the resource. The individuals who obtain benefits without paying are considered as free-riders.

According to the given situation, the citizens will get benefit from road repair. As the road will become smooth for riding thus the citizens will spend less money for repairing the torn tires and puncture. This is an example of positive externality. The citizens are the third party obtaining benefit from road repair.

You might be interested in
What is an example of an event that might require a public affairs professional?
Bond [772]

Answer:

Public affairs practitioners often carry out what are seen as traditional PR activities but with a political focus because, in many cases, the media can be a significant stakeholder to the organisation. These activities include writing press releases and articles, researching, copy writing, producing annual reports and managing databases of, and building up relationships with, media contacts. Depending on the organisation, public affairs practitioners will also take part in media interviews.

Explanation:

Or is a copy right is violated.

7 0
3 years ago
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the level of punishment for criminal attempt?
dezoksy [38]

Answer:

An attempt is generally punished as one-half the sentence of the completed crime.

6 0
3 years ago
Answer the following questions that have to do with the "Brown V. Board of Education".
icang [17]

Answer:

I agree with the decision of the case because in the declaration of independence paragraph two it states, "All men are created equal." it would be unconstitutional for schools to be separated based on the color of there skin. I wouldnt have done anything differently if I were a judge of the supreme court because I would know that it violates the the 14 Amendment.

6 0
3 years ago
what can the average citizen do to MOST influence who is appointed to the supreme court hurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

write to their senator to support or oppose a candidate

Explanation:

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • How can a case reach a federal court of appeals without having gone to trial in any court previously?
    9·1 answer
  • The principle that state governments and the federal government work together to devlop national policies is know as
    11·1 answer
  • Pls hurry i will mark the brainliest has to be right 20 points!!
    5·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer.
    6·2 answers
  • NEED ASAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • Put yourself in the place of one of the lawmakers in 1787. You are present to represent your state. At the end, you realize that
    14·2 answers
  • In what way does each branch of government check the act of each other?
    10·1 answer
  • The Supreme Court Case New Jersey v. TLO questioned the rights students had in public schools. TLO was a New Jersey high school
    12·1 answer
  • Project: Create an Employment Dispute and Resolve It through Arbitration
    11·1 answer
  • When one party promises to do what she is already legally obligated to do, the law considers this a(n)_______ and not valid cons
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!