Here's your correct matching arrangements:
1. This form of imperial rule involved claiming exclusive trading rights in certain areas. Trading rights must be granted under the threat of military force. In the 19th century, this type of imperial rule was used by countries such as Great Britain, France, Portugal, Russia, and Japan in China.
2. Local rulers such as kings or sultans were used to govern the colonies in order to lessen the possibility of a revolt. Great Britain practiced this type of imperialism.
3. A form of imperial rule in which local rulers were left in place, however, they were expected to follow the advice of imperial advisers on issues such as trade and missionary activity. In this form of imperial rule, the countries are still independent, however, they are under the protection of an imperial country.
4. Officials and soldiers from the imperial country were sent to control the colony. This type of imperial rule was practiced by the French.
The French Revolution, and more importantly its aftermath, resulted in the first major split in American national politics, which later grew and ended up in the first party system.
Thomas Jefferson, along with his followers, was pro-French, while Alexander Hamilton, John Adams and their associates were anti-French Revolution.
United States of America fought an undeclared war with the rise of Napoleon, pro-British a series of naval skirmishes known as the Quasi-War, with the Directory in 1798.
Hello! The answer to your question would be <em>Newt Gingrich, Armey, Armey Gingrich, Dr Newt Gingrich.</em>
<em>If you are talking about the book I suppose</em>
<em>P.S (Do mind the fact that there is just Armey as one of the authors, the first name is an inappropriate word that Brainly does not allow me to put in)</em>
Answer:
It imparitive that we have judicial review because its necessary to determine the meaning of ambiguous provisions of the Constitution or to answer fundamental questions left unaddressed by its creators. Without someone assigned to interpret the Constitution, we would be in a constant state of disagreement when determining verdicts.
Explanation:
hope this helps???
It would have reduced the number of foreign-born people entering the US
