I believe the answer to this is "true." Really, all conclusions on all events are subjective. But considering history, conclusions on events are especially prone to subjectivity. Consider who writes the history books. If one country wins a war against another country, they will write about themselves as the noble party and portray the enemy as villainous. However, this may not be the real case. This occurs much more than we think, and we must research different events to make sure we are not blindly buying into what people say. Hope this helps.
B is the most likely answer
Three examples of imagery regarding where Grendel and his mother are:
- No one knows its bottom,
- 'Hunted through the woods by packs of hounds
- 'They live in secret places...'
<h3>What is imagery?</h3>
Imagery is a term that shows a vivid description of the events in a story. When describing the evil place where Grendel and his mother lived, the usage of terms that depict the place as not having a bottom and being in the woods clearly show that it was a strange and hideous place.
The place was also described as secret and this meant that it was not easily accessible or known to others. Grendel and his mother were not good people as seen in the story, Beowulf. This is also reflected in the description of the place where they lived.
The reader can imagine that the place where they stayed was weird. So, the phrases above connote a good depiction of imagery.
Learn more about imagery here:
brainly.com/question/25938417
#SPJ1
I’d say maybe B?
Correct me if I’m wrong
Whats the question exactly?
