1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lemur [1.5K]
3 years ago
8

In a free enterprise system, consumers choose their occupations and decide where

Business
2 answers:
ivanzaharov [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

true

Explanation:

I think the answer is true

umka21 [38]3 years ago
6 0
Answer is true .....
You might be interested in
Blue Ridge Hot Tubs manufactures and sells two models of hot tubs: the Aqua-Spa and the Hydro-Lux. Howie Jones, the owner and ma
34kurt

Answer:

a lot is missing in this question, so I looked for a similar one:

Howie buys prefabricated fiberglass hot tub shells from a local supplier and adds the pump and tubing to the shells to create his hot tubs.  (This supplier has the capacity to deliver as many hot tub shells as Howie needs.)  Howie installs the same type of pump into both hot tubs.  

He will have only 200 pumps available during his next production cycle.  From a manufacturing standpoint, the main difference between the two models of hot tubs is the amount of tubing and labor required.  Each Aqua-Spa requires 9 hours of labor and 12 feet of tubing.  Each Hydro-Lux requires 6 hours of labor and 16 feet of tubing.  Howie expects to have 1,520 production labor hours and 2,650 feet of tubing available during the next production cycle.   Howie earns a profit of $350 on each Aqua-Spa he sells and $300 on each Hydro-Lux he sells.

you have to maximize the following equation: 350A + 300H

where:

A = number of Aqua-Spa hot tubs sold

H = number of Hydro-Lux hot tubs sold

the constraints are:

A + H ≤ 200

9A + 6H ≤ 1,520

12A + 16H ≤ 2,650

A ≥ 0

B ≥ 0

both A and B are integers

Using solver, the optimal solution is: 117A + 77B, and the maximum profit = $64,050

3 0
3 years ago
A broker-dealer is physically located and registered in State A. The broker-dealer has an existing client in State A who is a st
mars1129 [50]

Answer:

D) The broker-dealer must be registered in State B in order to contact the client while she is in medical school in State B

Explanation:

Since the client will live in state B for an extended period of time, at least 4 years if she completes medical school, the broker-dealer must be registered in state B if he wishes to continue doing business with her.

If the client would have only gone to state B for a few months, then the broker could have still worked with her without registering in state B since the client could be considered on a vacation trip.

7 0
4 years ago
. Suppose absolute purchasing power parity holds. The exchange rate between British pounds and US dollars is British pound 0.75
svetoff [14.1K]

The stereo would cost 3750 British pound in Britain at the prevailing exchange rate.

Explanation:

Given details-  

The exchange rate between the British pound and US Dollar- 0.75 British pounds for 1 USD

Cost of the stereo= 5000 USD

Proportionate cost of the stereo in the British pound-

Exchange rate conundrum can be understood in the following way easily-

It means that for every 1 USD, a person in Britain would shell out 0.75 British pounds. In other words, the British pound is dearer than USD.

Since the cost of the stereo is 5000 USD and 1 USD is 0.75 British pound

5000 USD would equal 5000* 0.75 British pound= 3750 British pound

cost of the stereo is 3750 British pound

3 0
3 years ago
What is the amount of profit Tumbleweed makes when both advertise? $ How much profit does Native Roots make when both advertise?
dimaraw [331]

Complete Question:

There are two plant nurseries in a small town. They are called Tumbleweed and Native Roots. If neither advertises, Tumbleweed makes $80,000 a month in profits and Native Roots makes $95,000. Advertising would cost each firm $20,000 a month. If only one firm advertises, that firm increases sales by $50,000 a month whereas the non-advertising firm loses out. If Tumbleweed doesn't advertise but Native Roots does, Tumbleweed loses $30.000 a month. If Native Roots doesn't advertise but Tumbleweed does, it loses $35,000 a month. If both advertise, they increase revenue by $15,000 each. Insofar as they grow their products from the ground, they don't have any increased costs when they have increased sales (that is, their marginal cost of production is $0). 7th attempt Part 1 (2 points) See Hint What is the amount of profit Tumbleweed makes when both advertise? $ How much profit does Native Roots make when both advertise? $ See Hint Part 2 (1 point) What outcome is predicted (that is, the Nash equilibrium) for these two firms, given the figures above? Choose one: • A. Both firms advertise. B. Tumbleweed advertises, but Native Roots doesn't. C. Native Roots advertises, but Tumbleweed doesn't. D. Neither firm advertises.

Answer:

Tumbleweed and Native Roots

Part 1:

a. The amount of profit that Tumbleweed makes when both advertise is:

= $95,000 ($80,000 + $15,000)

b. The amount of profit that Native Roots makes when both advertise is:

= $110,000 ($95,000 + $15,000)

Part 2:

The predicted outcome (that is, the Nash equilibrium) for these two firms, given the figures above is:

A. Both firms advertise.

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

                                                           Tumbleweed  Native Roots

Profits without advertisement              $80,000         $95,000

Advertising cost per month                    20,000           20,000

Loss without advertisement                  -30,000          -35,000

Gain with advertisement                        50,000           50,000

Gain if both firms advertise                    15,000            15,000

6 0
3 years ago
A corporation issued 8% bonds with a par value of $1,000,000, receiving a $20,000 premium. On the interest date 5 years later, a
MariettaO [177]

Answer:

$22,000 gain

Explanation:

Calculation for the gain or loss on this retirement

Using this formula

Carrying value of bonds = Par value + Unamortized premium - Retirement purchased price

Let plug in the formula

Carrying value of bonds =$1,000,000+(100%-40%*$20,000)-$990,000

Carrying value of bonds =$1,000,000+(60%*$20,000)-$990,000

Carrying value of bonds =$1,000,000+$12,000-$990,000

Carrying value of bonds =$22,000 gain

Therefore the gain on this retirement is:$22,000 gain

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Assuming that all other requirements are met, a corporation may elect to be treated as an s corporation under the internal reven
    14·1 answer
  • Karen is a home care aid. she earns about $10.00 an hour and works 40 hours a week. she is unable to save, and last month her ca
    8·1 answer
  • True or false? fat loading in the days and weeks prior to an event is recommended as a method of enhancing athletic performance.
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following describes the classification and normal balance of the fees earned account? a.asset, credit b.liability,
    15·1 answer
  • Over the past five years, Teen Clothing stock produced returns of 18.7, 5.8, 7.9, 10.8, and 11.6 percent,respectively. For the s
    9·1 answer
  • The advertising promise that captures the reason that people buy products is known as:____________.
    7·1 answer
  • Kelly Pitney began her consulting business, Kelly Consulting, on April 1, 2016. The accounting cycle for Kelly Consulting for Ap
    7·1 answer
  • ReVitalAde produced 13,000 cases of powdered drink mix and sold 12,000 cases in April 2018. The sales price was $ 29​, variable
    5·1 answer
  • 1.2.5 quiz examining basic economic concepts
    12·1 answer
  • Why might a company choose an open office layout?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!