Answer:
$76,050
Explanation:
Given that,
cash price = $60,700
assumed accrued taxes = $5,260
attorney’s fees = $2,170
real estate broker’s commission = $3,310
clearing and grading = $4,610
Cost of the land:
= cash price + assumed accrued taxes + attorney’s fees + real estate broker’s commission + clearing and grading
= $60,700 + $5,260 + $2,170 + $3,310 + $4,610
= $76,050
Answer:
They should operate Mine 1 for 1 hour and Mine 2 for 3 hours to meet the contractual obligations and minimize cost.
Explanation:
The formulation of the linear programming is:
Objective function:
Restrictions:
- High-grade ore: 
- Medium-grade ore: 
- Low-grade ore: 
- No negative hours: 
We start graphing the restrictions in a M1-M2 plane.
In the figure attached, we have the feasible region, where all the restrictions are validated, and the four points of intersection of 2 restrictions.
In one of this four points lies the minimum cost.
Graphically, we can graph the cost function over this feasible region, with different cost levels. When the line cost intersects one of the four points with the lowest level of cost, this is the optimum combination.
(NOTE: it is best to start with a low guessing of the cost and going up until it reaches one point in the feasible region).
The solution is for the point (M1=1, M2=3), with a cost of C=$680.
The cost function graph is attached.
Answer:
Amount paid in;
Bonuses to employees = $5,150
State tax = $5,150
Federal tax = $41,200
Explanation:
The bonus paid to employees, federal tax and state tax are all a percentage of the profit made by the company.
The amount of each of these elements may be computed by applying the applicable percentage on the profit made by the company before any of these deductions.
amounts paid in;
bonuses = 5% * $103,000
= $5,150
state tax = 5% * $103,000
= $5,150
and
federal tax = 40% * $103,000
= $41,200
Answer:
b longitudinal
Explanation:
it is b longitudinal. I just know
Answer: A.exceed units sold
Explanation:
In Absorption Costing, All costs be it Fixed or Variable that are directly related to production are considered when computing the Cost of Production.
Under Variable Costs however, only variable Costs are considered for the computing of Cost of Production.
This difference in consideration of costs under each method leads to difference in income determination under each method.
Under Absorption Costing, fixed manufacturing costs are apportioned on produced units and the costs are only recovered when the units are sold but under variable costing, fixed manufacturing costs are treated as period costs and are therefore charged to the Income statement.
This means that, the amount of income under absorption costing will be more than the amount of income under variable costing when units manufactured exceed units sold.
