<span>I see similarities in many things that the United States used to have issues with. Many people fought for African American and Women’s rights but now it is becoming an issue again. Yes, things are much better than they were in the past, but women still are being segregated in ways that men aren’t. Segregation in many ways is still an issue in the united states, and most likely always will be because of how the past was. Something that is a similarity that is very apparent is the fact that immigration is very much still a huge part of our nation and our economic growth. Another similarity is the structure of the government. This is something that has been in place for a very long time and with only small changes has worked for us for a long time.</span>
<span>No, this statement is false. Tsar Alexander emancipated Russian serfs through the Emancipation Edict Reform which was enacted in 1861. This reform gave serfs their freedom from feudal obligations and they were also given land. The landowners did receive compensation from the state. Peasants were then indebted to the sate and were forced to work and make payments as redemption to their local commune.</span>
Tobacco, by far, was the most profitable of the Middle Colonies' cash crops, but indigo, cotton, and cereals (rye, wheat, corn) were also common.
Answer:
<h2>A</h2>
Explanation:
When you read the passage, you end up finding out that the Roman Senate had most of the power and even the army. They also said it the senate had a great deal of power which helps you eliminate C and B. You are than left with A and D but when you read the second paragraph, you could understand that the answer is "A"
Answer:
It ruled against Dred Scott and set aside the Missouri Compromise and popular sovereignty.
Explanation:
The case Dred Scott v. Sanford argued whether a slave can obtain his freedom when he step on a state that make slavery illegal.
It happened in 1857. At that time, Dred Scott's (A slave) was taken by his owner from Missouri to Illinois. (According to Missouri compromise, It is still legal to own slaves in Missouri but It is Illegal to do so in Illinois).
Scott tried to make his case to the court stating that as soon as he entered Illinois, his status as a slave should be voided and he should be considered as a citizen.
At that time, The Missouri supreme court ruled against Scott's plead. The court stated that he could never be a citizen since citizenship only apply to white people. So he's still a slave no matter where his slave owner took him.
