Singular command. In a motor vehicle accident with multiple victims, the scene will be chaotic and having a single, clear leader will best help resolve the situation.
Answer:
The correct response is "for the carryover or carryforward year".
Explanation:
- NOL usually happens that whenever a taxpayer's corporate taxable income exceeds his corporation yearly revenue. The whole NOL could be utilized to back split from several other taxable incomes, which have become perhaps throughout the future, in other words, managed to carry forward.
- Throughout the current environment, and there'll be revenue, NOL would be adapted and the tax burden would be whittled down either by NOL proportion.
The make-to-stock manufacturing (MTS) strategy can be described as producing products to put into stock based on a demand forecast.
In this strategy, companies do not maintain productive stability over a period of time, but adjust their manufacturing strategy according to times when demand can increase or decrease.
Some advantages of the make-to-stock strategy are:
- Economy of scale.
- Waste reduction.
- Efficiency in the use of resources.
- Increased response time.
So this is an effective manufacturing strategy for companies that can accurately forecast their demand.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/24099922
Answer and Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
1) Marginal propensity to consume (MPC) for this economy is 0.75 as it denotes the spending of the household and saving of 0.25 and the spending multiplier for this economy is
= Spending Multiplier(M)
= 1 ÷ 1 - MPC
= 1 ÷ 1-0.75
= 1 ÷ 0.25
= 4
2). Decrease in government purchases will lead to a decrease in income, generating an initial change in consumption
= -Amount of Government Decrease Purchases by × MPC
= -$250 billion × 0.75
= -$187.5 billion
3). Decrease income again, causing a second change in consumption
= Amount Decrease in Government Purchases × MPC
= -$187.5 billion × 0.75
= $140.6 billion
4).Total change in demand resulting from the initial change in government spending
= Amount of Government Decrease Purchases by × Spending Multiplier(M)
= $250 × 4
= $1,000 billion
= $1 trillion
As we can see that the income falls by $1000 billion in the end, so AD shifts to the left by the size of $1 trillion
In the question the graph is missing. Kindly find the attachment for both of question and answer