Answer:
total Equity at end of the year = $69019 million
Explanation:
given data
assets = $123,249 million
liabilities = $54,230 million
to find out
total equity
solution
we get here total Equity at end of the year that is express as
total Equity at end of the year = Asset - Liabilities .................1
put here value we get
total Equity at end of the year = $123,249 million - $54,230 million
total Equity at end of the year = $69019 million
Answer:
D. 5.00
Explanation:
The calculation of current ratio is given below :-
Current Ratio = Current Assets ÷ Current Liabilities
where,
Current Asset = cash + account receivable + office supply
= $400 + $1000 + $600
= $2,000
and the Current Liabilities is
= Account payable + salary payable
= $300 + $100
= $400
So, the current ratio is
= $2,000 ÷ $400
= 5 times
Answer:
Payback period = 3 years
Explanation:
<em>The payback period is the average length of time it takes the cash inflow from a project to recoup the cash outflow.</em>
<em>Where a project is expected to generate a series of equal annual net cash inflow, the payback period can be calculated as: </em>
<em>Payback period =The initial invest /Net cash inflow per year
</em>
The cash inflow = Net operating income + Depreciation
= 105, 000 + 45,000 = 150,000
Note we have to add back depreciation because it is not a cash-based expenses. And payback period makes use of only cash-based revenue and expenses.
Payback period = 450,000/150,000
= 3 years
Payback period = 3 years
Answer:
In this scenario, the<u> "common stockholders"</u> of the company take part in the voting process.
Explanation:
Common stockholders have right to vote and they can generally vote about the matters of corporate policy, which also includes decisions about how to make the board of directors, starting corporate activities and what changes are made in the company's operations.
This would indeed present a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest occurs when a person or an organization is involved in various commitments, obligations or tasks, and where serving one interest could involve working against the other. In this case, the law firm that represents the tug boat manufacturer has as its goal the maintenance of objectivity and the pursuit of justice. However, if the son of the canal administrator joins the firm, this could be put at jeopardy, as he would have a vested interest in a particular outcome.
